YTUP
Journals
About
Services
Guides
Sign InSubmit Article
HomeJournalsSigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences10.14744/sigma.2023.00011
SJSigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences
Get Alerted Download PDF
AbstractKeywordsReferencesShare and CiteRelated Articles
Article Open Access1 January 2023

Intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft topology and ıts applications to multi-criteria decision-making

Order Reprints Cite Share

Adem YOLCU

Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2023, Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. 106-118; doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00011

Download PDF View DOI record

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft topology. Certain properties of intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft (IFH) topology like IFH basis, IFH subspace, IFH interior and IFH cloure are investigated. Furthermore, the multicriteria decision making (MCDM) algorithms with aggregation operators based on IFH topology are developed. In Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2, MCDM problem is applied for IFH sets and IFH topology, respectively. Any real-life implementations of the proposed MCDM algorithms are demonstrated by numerical illustrations.

Keywords: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hypersoft Set; İntuitionistic Fuzzy Hypersoft Topology; IFH İnterior(Closure); IFH Basis; MCDM

References

  1. Alcantud JCR. Soft open bases and a novel construc- [20] Ozturk TY, Yolcu A. On neutrosophic hypersoft tion of soft topologies from bases for topologies. topological spaces. In: Smarandache F, Abdel- Mathematics 2020;8:672. [CrossRef] Baset M, Saeed M, Saqlain M, editors. Theory and
  2. Atanassov KT, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets application of hypersoft set. 1st ed. Brussels: Pons Syst 1986;20:87–96. [CrossRef] Publishing House; 2021. pp. 215–234.
  3. Atanassov K, Gargov G. Interval valued intuition- [21] Ozturk TY, Gunduz Aras C, Bayramov S. A new istic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1989;31:343–349. approach to operations on neutrosophic soft sets and [CrossRef] to neutrosophic soft topological spaces. Commun
  4. Aygunoglu A, Aygun H. Some notes on soft topo- Math Appl 2019;10:481–493. [CrossRef] logical spaces. Neural Comput Appl 2012;21:113– [22] Ozturk TY. On bipolar soft topological spaces. J
  5. [CrossRef] New Theory 2018;20:64–75.
  6. Cagman N, Karatas S, Enginoglu S. Soft topology. [23] Ozturk TY, Yolcu A. Some structures on pythag- Comput Math Appl 2011;62:351–358. [CrossRef] orean fuzzy topological spaces. J New Theory
  7. Coker D. An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy 2020;33:15–25. topological spaces. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1997;88:81–89. [24] Roy AR, Maji PK. A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach [CrossRef] to decision making problems. J Comput Appl Math
  8. Deli I. Hybrid Set Structures Under Uncertainly 2007;203:412–418. [CrossRef] Parameterized Hypersoft Sets: Theory and
  9. Saeed M, Ahsan M, Siddique MK, Ahmad MR. A Applications In: Smarandache F, Abdel-Baset M, study of the fundamentals of hypersoft set theory. Saeed M, Saqlain M, editors. Theory and application Int J Sci Eng Res 2020;11:230. of hypersoft set. 1st ed. Brussels: Pons Publishing
  10. Smarandache F. Extension of soft set to hypersoft set, House; 2021. pp. 24–49. and then to plithogenic hypersoft set. Neutrosophic
  11. Enginoglu S, Arslan B. Intuitionistic fuzzy param- Sets Syst 2018;22:168–170. eterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their
  12. Simsekler Dizman T, Ozturk TY. Fuzzy bipolar application in decision-making. Comput Appl Math soft topological spaces. TWMS J App Eng Math 2020;39:325. [CrossRef] 2021;11:151–159.
  13. Terepeta M. On separating axioms and similarity of J. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multicriteria group soft topological spaces. Soft Comput 2019;23:1049– decision making problems using the characteristic 1057. [CrossRef] objects method. Symmetry 2020;12:1382. [CrossRef]
  14. Feng F, Zheng Y, Alcantud JCR, Wang Q. Minkowski tic fuzzy decision making: an overview. Inf Fusion weighted score functions of intuitionistic fuzzy val- 2016;28:10–23. [CrossRef] ues. Mathematics 2020;8:1143. [CrossRef]
  15. Garg H, Kaur G. Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and fuzzy hypersoft set. Commun Fac Sci Univ Ank Ser its fundamental properties. J. Multvalued Log S A1 Math Stat 2021;70:443–455. [CrossRef] 2019;33:507–537.
  16. Garg H, Kumar K. Linguistic interval-valued Application to Decision-Making. In: Smarandache Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their appli- F, Abdel-Baset M, Saeed M, Saqlain M, editors. cations to group decision-making problems. IEEE Theory and application of hypersoft set. 1st ed. Trans Fuzzy Syst 2019;27:2302–2311. [CrossRef] Brussels: Pons Publishing House; 2021. pp. 50–64.
  17. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 1965;8:338–353. S, Kumar R. Introduction to plithogenic hyper- [CrossRef] soft subgroup. Neutrosophic Sets Sys 2020;33:14. [33] Zulqarnain RM, Xin XL, Saqlain M, Smarandache [CrossRef] F. Generalized aggregate operators on neutrosophic
  18. Hussain S. On some properties of Intuitionistic hypersoft set. Neutrosophic Sets Sys 2020;36:271– fuzzy soft boundary. Commun Fac Sci Univ Ank Ser
  19. [CrossRef] A1 Math Stat 2020;69:39–50. [CrossRef]
  20. Li Z, Cui R. On the topological structures of intu- TOPSIS method under intuitionistic fuzzy hyper- itionistic fuzzy soft sets. Ann Fuzzy Math Inform soft environment based on correlation coe_cient 2013;5:229–239. and aggregation operators to solve decision making
  21. Maji PK, Biswas R, Roy AR. Fuzzy soft sets. J Fuzzy problem. AIMS Mathematics 2021;6:2732–2755. Math 2001;9:589–602. [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

YOLCU, A. Intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft topology and ıts applications to multi-criteria decision-making. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2023, Vol. 41, pp. 106-118. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00011

Export:

Related Articles

Observation of experts attitudes through multi-criteria decision-makingAsma MAHMOOD, Mujahid ABBAS et al., 1 January 2023Correlation based sensitivity analysis and suitability evaluation of multicriteria decision-making mYağmur ŞAN, Ercan ŞENYİĞİT, 1 January 2025Comparison of NSGA-II and MODE performances by using MCDM methods for multi-response experimental daSerhan TUNÇEL, Özlem TÜRKŞEN et al., 1 January 2025Turning Process Parameters Optimization of Al7075 Hybrid Mmcs Composite Using Topsis MethodVajrala Venkata REDDY, 1 January 2020
Publication History
Published1 January 2023
Versionv1
AccessOpen Access
10.14744/sigma.2023.00011
Article Figures (3)
Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3
Related Articles
Observation of experts attitudes through multi-criteria decision-makingAsma MAHMOOD, Mujahid ABBAS et al.Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 1 January 2023Correlation based sensitivity analysis and suitability evaluation of multicriteria decision-making mYağmur ŞAN, Ercan ŞENYİĞİTSigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 1 January 2025Comparison of NSGA-II and MODE performances by using MCDM methods for multi-response experimental daSerhan TUNÇEL, Özlem TÜRKŞEN et al.Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 1 January 2025
Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences coverSigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences Download PDF

Subscribe to YTUP

Stay connected and receive the latest research updates directly in your inbox.

YTUP — Yıldız Technical University Publishing

Advancing knowledge and fostering innovation through high-quality, peer-reviewed academic publications.

About YTU

Discover

  • ›Articles
  • ›Journals
  • ›Research Topics
  • ›Open Access Policy

Guidelines

  • ›Author guidelines
  • ›Services for authors
  • ›Policies and publication ethics
  • ›Editor guidelines
  • ›Fee policy

Explore

  • ›Articles
  • ›Research Topics
  • ›Journals
  • ›How we publish

Support

  • ›Help center
  • ›Emails and alerts
  • ›Contact us
  • ›Submit
  • ›Career opportunities
YTU Logo

© 2026 Yıldız Technical University (Istanbul, Turkey)

Terms and ConditionsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyPrivacy SettingsDisclaimer
Like this platform? Join our teamHave feedback or questions?
Supervisor