Efficiency improvement of semi-evaporative cooling systems through environmental analysis
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2025, Vol. 43, Issue 4, pp. 1113-1123; doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2025.00108
Abstract
Keywords: Air Conditioning; Building Applications; Evaporative Cooler; Heat Pipe; Saturation Efficiency
Introduction
Evaporative cooling was used to preserve a pleasant climate inside historic buildings. There are benefits and drawbacks associated with the use of this methodology. It offers other benefits in addition to enhancing indoor air quality, lowering environmental impact, using less energy, being easy to use, and requiring less upkeep. In order for an evaporative refrigerator to function, thermal energy in the air must be changed from an observable to
an imperceptible or difficult-to-distinguish condition. The temperature and partial pressure differential between vapour and air cause the transfer of mass and heat. Vapor compression refrigeration, which uses CFCs or HCFCs, has a far worse environmental effect than evaporative cooling. Evaporative refrigerators use a lot less energy than electric vapor compression refrigeration systems for the transportation of water and air [1, 2]. The main drawback of evaporative coolers is that they need outside air to function.
*Corresponding author. *E-mail address: subhash.gadhave534@gmail.com This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Editor-in-Chief Ahmet Selim Dalkilic Published by Yıldız Technical University Press, İstanbul, Turkey © Author. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
The temperature differential that occurs between the moist and dry bulbs causes evaporation [3]. Evaporative cooling systems come in a variety of configurations and may be divided into three main categories: indirect, direct, or semi-indirect [4]. High temperatures and dry weather are ideal settings for evaporative coolers to operate in. There are several different types of climates in India, such as hot and dry, cold, warm and humid, temperate, composite, and tropical. There is a wide range of warm-humid, hot-dry, and variable climates. Direct evaporative coolers lose efficiency in warm, humid locations from 80% to 90% relative humidity (RH) in the summer. Because of the relatively low humidity levels in this area, which range from 30% to 50%, direct evaporative coolers are often used. Refrigerators that use direct evaporation simplify the process of controlling humidity and temperature [5,6]. Meanwhile, academic research indicates that the creation of an indirect evaporative chiller that is both flexible and energy-efficient is about to happen. Compared to traditional refrigeration techniques, indirect evaporative coolers have less pollution and better environmental benefits. It has been shown that evaporative coolers may save energy in dry and hot climates all over the world. The evaporative chiller system is in charge of providing comfort inside the building [1, 2, 4, 7-10]. Researchers have previously looked at the thermodynamics of evaporative coolers and ways to increase the efficiency of direct and indirect designs by using tubing and plates. The possible advantages of heat pipes, dew points, and semi-indirect evaporative cooling techniques have not been thoroughly studied. To fully understand the mass and heat transport processes inside these innovative evaporative cooler systems, further theoretical and empirical study is needed [1, 11]. Heat transmission devices with high efficiency are known as heat pipes. It has the ability to transport heat without the need for more energy [12]. Heat recovery heat pipes are a common kind of heat exchanger in HVAC systems. Wang et al. [13] achieved secondary heat recovery by including a heat pipe heat exchanger (HPHE) in their HVAC system. Ragil et al. [14] created a high-performance heat exchanger (HPHE) specifically with the aim of providing HVAC systems for hospital isolation chambers that are used to treat patients with respiratory diseases. The feasibility of installing vertical U-shaped fins on a high-performance heat exchanger (HPHE) to reduce the energy consumption of HVAC systems used for cooling and reheating purposes was investigated by Hakim et al. [15]. FJR Martinez et al.’s 2003 research [16] focused on heat ducts and evaporative coolers. Implementing a mixed-air energy recovery system is the main goal of this project, which aims to enhance indoor air quality. The results show that by using the energy from air circulation, air conditioning systems that include an air recovery system—which consists of heat pipes and an indirect evaporative cooler—may become more energy efficient. Liu Y. and colleagues used elevation refrigerators for their heat pipeline research. The hybrid cooling system’s efficiency
is greatly increased by dew point evaporative chillers and microchannel heat pipes [17]. There is a dearth of studies on the use of finned heat ducts in evaporative coolers. Riffat et al. [18] first documented the use of heat pipes in evaporative refrigerators in 2004. Later writers carried on the research [19–21]. Global power costs have surged as a result of growing demand from the commercial and industrial sectors. Saudi Arabian electricity is costly, and freezers use a significant amount of energy from the power system [22–25]. Evaporative cooling (EC) is a very cost-effective and efficient way to reduce the energy required for space cooling by using a VCR system. Because the water pump and compressor have lower power outputs than the VCR system, the EC system uses less energy. When compared to a VCR system, the costs of setting up, maintaining, and running an EC system are lower [26–28]. As air moves over the cooling mats, water takes up heat from the surrounding atmosphere, lowering the overall air temperature. Higher dry bulb temperatures and lower relative humidity all help to improve EC cooling efficiency. Scientists have studied the EC system in great detail to increase its efficacy. An evaporative cooling (EC) system’s performance is affected by a number of factors, such as air flow rate, ambient air conditions (such as humidity and temperature of the dry bulb), and the flow rate, thickness, density, and substance of the cooling pad water [29–34].
Experimental Procedure
System of Cooling Thermoelectric coolers, vapor compression chillers, vacuum coolers, and compressor-determined metal hydride cooling systems are examples of electrically powered cooling equipment. The most powerful electrical system is found in the air conditioning Vapor Compression Chiller (VCC). Although the compressor-driven metal hydride cooling system has been studied in the literature, this is just the initial stage. Thermoelectric coolers have a wide range of uses, including medical, communications, military, and vacuum food coolers. Compressor-Driven Metal Hydride Cooling (CDMHC) The Compressor-Driven Metal Hydride Cooling (CDMHC) is an environmentally friendly hydrogen absorption and release system. A compressor creates a pressure difference between two metal reactors to desorb H2. The biggest disadvantage of the method is the removal of parasites. Because parasite wounds are reduced in the CDMHC, its COP may be higher than in the VCC. In metal hydride cooling systems powered by compressors, unexpected load changes and startup have less of an influence on compressor overloading [30]. Mazumdar et al. [32], [33], [34], and Park et al. [31] evaluated CDMHC’s cooling capacity and unique potential to increase performance. They observed
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
that the characteristics of metal hydrides had a significant influence on structural efficacy. Improvements in compressor efficiency, metal conductivity, slurry mass ratio, and compressor pressure ratio in the direction of hydrogen enhance the coefficient of performance (COP). Cooling By Thermodynamics To link the system with the sorption structures, the sorption technique and ejector cooling are utilized. Chemical or physical sorption brings one substance near another. The most common thermally powered sorption devices for HVAC in buildings are adsorption, absorption, and desiccant dehumidifiers. Sorption may also be utilized to cool hot metal hydrides. Cooling Based on Absorption This theory is based on the fact that liquids may both desorb and absorb vapor from another fluid, the solubility of which varies with pressure and temperature. The condenser cools the superheated vapor structure of the refrigerant that the generator generates when the force is high. As the condensed refrigerant evaporates at low pressure, the intermediate temperature falls. At this time, the vapor from the evaporator escapes with a spray of the weak refrigerant solution over the top of the absorber. The heat is delivered to the cooling fluid from the condenser and absorber. For the most part, the only alternatives are H2O and NH3, or LiBr and H2O. A rectifier is necessary when utilizing H2O/ NH3 as an absorbent in an absorption cooling system to eliminate the water before the NH3 reaches the condenser. Effıciency Variations Caused By Semi-Direct Evaporation The outside air temperature, air intake velocity effects and their configurations, cooling pad thickness, cooling capacity, and saturation competence affect a semi-indirect evaporative cooling system’s thermodynamic performance. A modification in the configuration of the cooling medium concludes the behavior pattern of the semi-indirect evaporative cooling system. This study goes far beyond just suggesting that asymmetrical cooling pads provide remarkable performance. This information contrasts the thermodynamic research configurations on the structure’s three sides, employing square, hexagonal, pentagonal, octagonal, and triangular patterns and shapes to make use of the cooling medium’s wetted surface area in semi-indirect evaporative cooling.
Cooling Analysis
Experimental Cooling Pad Analyses In typical air conditioners, the cooling coil and condenser work together to offer the most efficient cooling pads. The LMTD (Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference) model is used to estimate the effectiveness of cooling pads. This follow-up research phase’s objective is to finally get there. We’ll look at the distinctions between buildup cooling pads and conservative cooling pads in this section. Some study investigates the possibilities of a cooling pad to decrease agricultural waste. Sugar cane, banana tree, coconut, honeycomb paper, and khus fibers are employed in this inquiry. The packing density for all four cooling pads is 44.44 kg/m3. The honeycomb paper pad was incised to the same size as the extra build-up cooling pads using a 90° tumbler method. New vendors’ khus fibers, honeycomb fibers, coconut fibers, and even sugarcane and banana fibers may be subjected to lab testing with unpredictable airflow. It is detailed how the experimental setting for analyzing five different kinds of cooling pads was created. Because bananas, coconut fibers, and sugarcane are considered agricultural waste, they are available all year in India. Experiment Parameters Because of human mistakes; physical and technical limits, every inquiry has some positive uncertainty and error. The consequences of such autonomous imprecision are highly debated. The approach described here investigated factors such as air velocity, relative humidity, and temperature. Table 1 highlights details on the instruments, as well as parameters. Processıng Thermocouple Application The utilization of measuring tools, techniques, and standards is required for thermocouple calibration. Before using a thermocouple, the temperature must be set such that it stays consistent across a suitably large region. Thermostatic reference points that can be adjusted A graphite thermometer acts as a fixed-point unit in a graphite crucible holding a metal component. When it freezes, this metal component maintains a somewhat steady temperature. A simple calibration procedure requires just a few instructions. To do a basic calibration, water is heated to 30 degrees. The open end of the thermocouple is then connected to both multimeters, and since both ends of the thermocouple are at
Table 1. Details on the instruments, as well as parameters Parameter
0.4. to 20.0 m/s
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
the same temperature, the device multimeter must read 0 microvolts. The power is shown after the multimeter measurement is constant. Voltage measurements are obtained once again at 37 degrees Celsius. This procedure of increasing the temperature by 5 degrees Celsius is repeated until the temperature reaches 60 degrees Celsius. Revolutionizing Cooling Systems In a semi-indirect evaporative cooling system with two independent airstreams, rock-solid absorbent ceramic pipes allow for mass transfer as well as heat transmission. This is a revolutionary strategy since the pipes filter out germs and inhibit the spread of legionella. This set-up is called a semi-indirect evaporative cooling system because the main airstream’s specific humidity depends on mass transfer, heat (mass transfer) depends on humidity, and the porous pipe’s ability to let more or less water pass through it. The building’s improvement diversion arrangement defines the room’s bounds. This semi-indirect evaporative cooler (SIEC) uses two different air streams, one for chilling and one for making indirect contact with water, to increase evaporative cooling efficiency. Water is recycled with the expelled air because it is vital. T5 equals 400°C, T4 equals 36.50°C, T3 equals 330°C, T2 equals 29.50°C, and T1 equals 260°C temperature was selected.
Results And Discussion
Figure 1 shows how the variable confirmation air pace affects product air temperature and wet bulb efficiency. This illustration also compares the velocities and efficiency of the intake air channels. The air temperature in the two channels is between 30 and 35 degrees Celsius, the humidity is 35% (the wet bulb temperature ranges between 18.9 and 23 degrees Celsius), and the air velocity ranges between 3 and 2.5 meters per second (m/s), 2 and 1.5 meters per second (m/s), and 1 meter per second (m/s). The wet bulb efficiency of mutually negative air heat decreased from 1 to 2 m/s. The air velocity was confirmed to be 1-2 meters per second, and the wet-bulb efficiency for heating the air between 30 and 35 degrees Celsius made sense. Wet bulbs may have an efficiency of more than 100% when the air rate for directly heated air is less than 2 m/s. While the air temperature increased linearly with the confirmed air rate for both the 35oC and 30oC delta temperatures, the dew point temperature may have been refined within that cooler at velocities less than 2 m/s. The functional air rate is enhanced to achieve the condensed abruptness consumed by operational air in a wet channel, which causes contact with the operational air and minimizes the wet exterior. In order to minimize the focus on air temperature for input air temperatures below their wet-bulb efficiency and wet-bulb temperature of more than 100%, the cooler’s speed should be between 1 and 2 meters per second.
Figure 1. Efficiency and intake air channel velocity comparison.
Intake Channel Impact Humidity The measured effects of inlet relative humidity and access air rate on water consumption are shown in Figure 2. The input air channel velocity and water use are compared in this scenario. The relative humidity of the incoming air may be between 55% and 45% at 35 degrees Celsius and 1-2 meters per second.
Figure 2. Water usage and intake air channel velocity are compared.
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
Efficiency of Temperature Regulation If you put 35°C air into a dry channel with 35% relative humidity (dew point 17.9°C, wet bulb temperature, and Twb 23°C), Figure 3 shows the temperature, relative humidity, and mass flood percentage of the air that comes out. Figure 4 shows comparison of the amount of water used and the speed of the intake air path. Wet Bulb Efficiency, Dew Point, Dew Point Temperature, Coeffıcient of Performance, and Relative Humidity Figure 5 demonstrate the effects of adjusting the relative humidity of the intake air on cooling capacity, COP, dew point, and wet bulb efficacy. The supply air flow rate was 0.0032 kg/s, the input air temperature was 35 oC, and the relative humidity levels were 55, 50, 45, 40, and 35%, respectively. A positive relationship occurs between relative humidity, cooling capacity, and COP, whereas a negative relationship exists between several quantities. More humid incoming air benefits both the cooling capacity and the COP of the structure. Because the vapor force separation between the air and water borders is more prominent when the intake air humidity is low, even if the inlet air humidity is low, more wetness will be brought in via the wet channel. Figure 6 shows comparison between cooling unit and power usage.
cost SAR 1.06 million, or nearly the same as the electricity excise charge of 0.175 SAR/kWh. The electrical expenses for operating the air-shaping vapor density structure at the same time would be more than SAR 5 million to SAR 5.25 million. The energy expenses of operating an evaporative cooler are often lowered by more than 70%. As seen in Figure 7, all of the cost structures and COPs are well-known. Evaporative cooling systems reduce both electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions while also providing a nice breeze. Based on the discharge
Strong Action This study made no mention of a structure built to regulate its cooling load and vapor density, aiming for COP
3. The total power consumption of the two cooler types is
shown in Figure 6. If the evaporative cooling structure association is implemented, the lattice top power requirements might be lowered by 163 MW. Running the evaporative cooling units beyond the excursion hour is anticipated to
Figure 4. Comparison of the amount of water used and the speed of the intake air path.
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
Figure 8. Comparison of temperature and sensible heat recovered. Figure 6. Comparison between cooling unit and power usage.
Table 2. Analysis of variance for enhanced sensible heat Factors
for each angle. The DoF of the investigated variables is displayed in segment 3, followed by the percentage of variation explained in segment 4, and lastly the variance values in segment 5. These are the most tense results from these investigations. Figure 7. Comparison of an evaporative cooling system and an operating cost-saving option.
aspect of the power age mix of 0.75kg CO2 l/kWh, vapor compression systems and evaporative cooling structures save 24600 tons of CO2 (a 78% savings). The percentage reduction in CO2 emissions obtained by each evaporative cooler is shown. Figure 8 shows comparison of temperature and sensible heat recovered. Table 2 contains the complete ANOVA breakdown. The relationships between volumetric flow rate (VxT), temperature (HLxT), and relative humidity (VxHL) are shown in the first section. Part 2 displays the sum of squares (SS)
Air Flow Analysis The usual velocity contribution is close to 12%, according to Table 2. An increase in the convection coefficient of the outer stream results in an increase in air stream power. Temperature Analysis The rate of heat transfer determines whether or not heat exchangers are used to separate temperatures. When the temperature difference between the outside and recirculated air streams widens, rationality heat rises. At 12%, responsibility for variance analysis is rather close (Table 2). VxT Table 2 shows the greatest contributing velocity using a 45% inference. The entity aspect is supported via aspect rejection cooperation. In response to increasing
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
temperatures and airflow, rational heat is increased, and stage and upright progress. The findings are consistent and predictable. Practical expertise with danger assessment improves heat recovery. As a result, the V5 and T3 are the most cost-effective solutions. HLxT Table 2 shows a median contribution rate of 13%. The greatest practical rise in heat is associated with the highest temperature and average relative humidity. The close closeness of the humidity stages for each temperature determined accounts for the moisture specific aspect’s low responsibility. Error This demonstrates the larger degree of contribution, with a 9% inaccuracy vs a 4.5% error attributable to humidity. Examining the VxHLxT triangle connected with this rate could help us find out. Enhancement of Infrared Heat The ANOVA results are shown in Table 3. The variables that were studied are shown in Section 1: humidity, velocity, and the correlations between humidity and temperature (HLxT), velocity (VxT), and temperature (VxHL). The second portion is the aspect’s sum of squares (SS).
Table 4. Analysis of variance for enhanced total heat Factors
Examining The Humidity The causal velocity of 38% given in Table 4 is the highest for that component. When the humidity in a pipe is low, water evaporates from its surface. This increased humidity may prevent dehumidification, which is associated with depressing latent heat, resulting in a reduction in pleasant moisture. VxT Table 3 displays the total speeds of all key components at 15% closure. The extraordinary dehumidification impact (mean values dropping) and proximity values explain the zero dependability of the distinctive features. Table 3 of HLxT shows a 29% similarity to the causal velocity. HLxT enables users to zero in on a single query. When the air is hot and dry, a lot of water evaporates, but when the humidity is high, the detailed humidity value is high, and the conditions for pipe reduction are ideal. Even if the humidity level is lower, the same rationale may apply to rapid temperature readings. Static heat exchange is decreased in this manner. Temperature Increase The Analyses of Variance for enhanced total heat are shown Table 4. The many components that are meant to indicate degree-enhanced heat. In terms of the variance investigation, HLxT is the most causative. The ANOVA findings are shown in Table 4. Section 1 depicts the separation of relative humidity, volumetric flow velocity, and their associated temperature x-relationships (HLxT, VxT, and VxHL). The variance values in segment 2 are V-connected. Section 3 displays the sum of squares (SS) of the components; Section 4 displays their degree of freedom (Dof); and Section 5 displays their relative velocities (%). Temperature This is considerable, even when just a minor quantity of heat recovery is used. Because of the combined impacts of both the rational and torpid heat special effects, higher temperatures have a negative influence on the overall indicate value. The humidity relative This accounts for the lion’s share of the 40%. This is the fundamental concept of passive heat supply. Because of the connection of instantaneous rational heat recuperation, the SIEC is advantageous to indirect evaporative cooling structures, but mass transfer marvels have needed more sensible heat. HLxT The HL1 (low humidity level) indicates that sensible and passive heat recovery should be avoided in general. This picture changes when relative humidity goes up, especially at the highest temperatures (T5, T4, and T3), where latent and rational heat are both negative and condensation happens, supporting the tilt seen in the single feature. Experiments were carried out in order to improve the presentation of the fiber-tube evaporative air cooler. We evaluated a variety of
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
humidity levels, input temperatures, and flow speeds. These include operating the system dry initially, then with water to imitate condensation on the cooler’s fiber tubes. Primary (for system operation) and secondary (for system output) air often enter the system via the same ports. A variable air stream’s impact velocity was also observed. The outcomes of the experiments in different contexts are explained in Table 5. The Test Run For this test, the evaporative cooling surface of the fibers was not moist. It provided a horizontal supply strategy for determining the evaporative cooling capability of wet fiber material. The temperature variations throughout the presentations were minor, suggesting that the cooling effect was limited. RHin: Inlet relative humidity at ambient temperature; Tin: Set ambient inlet temperature; Tdry_out: The
temperature of the dry air channel from the exit (product or supply air); Twet_out: The temperature of the wet air channel at the outflow (process or working air); RHdry_out: The relative humidity of the dry air channel at the output; RHwet_out: The relative humidity from the wet air channel to the output. System Efficiency and Water Usage Velocity The system efficiency and water utilization concerns were resolved at the highest input dry bulb temperature, as shown in Table 6. Because the essential framework’s indirect mode of operation functions in many environmental situations, including the analysis of the heated feasibility linked with the adiabatic immersion temperature, a precedent mechanism on the cooling rise must be constructed. Warm ampleness estimates are equivalent for similar outside cools.
Table 5. Results of the dry test scenario in terms of relative humidity and temperature (only for un-wetted evaporative cooling surface) Tin (°C)
Table 6. Test for inlet dry bulb temperature Air Flow Channel
Table 7. Variations in the tabular layout of cooling load savings S. No
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
Table 8. Deviation in the cooling coil’s load during cooling S. No
Ceramic evaporative systems are less visible than other kinds of water purification systems due to their dependency on the water route during the susceptible exterior’s porous conditions and smoke phobia. In terms of monthly variable cooling loads, compare the semi-evaporative cooling system with the ceramic pipe redesign to the traditional
cooling system and tables 7 for basic construction. Table 8 shows a monthly breakdown of the load of cooling on cooling twist with respect to different factors. In our test setup, an assortment of cooling events occurred on the cooling coil to humidify within the enhanced semi-evaporative cooling system as per the
Figure 9. Comparison of the humidifier’s efficacy and the coil’s cooling load for evaporative coolers.
Figure 10. Comparison of the apparatus’s dew point temperature and supply specific humidity.
Sigma J Eng Nat Sci, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1113−1123, August, 2025
supplied limit as shown in Figure 9. Further, ccomparison of the apparatus’s dew point temperature and supply specific humidity is mentioned in Figure 10.
Conclusion
When the air supply is near the ground and temperatures and relative humidity are high, the model predicts that the ceramic pipe surface will evaporate. Each month, the cooling coil loads of semi-evaporative cooling versus traditional air conditioning were evaluated. • The wet-bulb efficiency is around average at 2 meters per second of intake air velocity. • Reduced relative humidity leads to a reduction in chilling capacity. When the relative humidity exceeds 55%, the wet bulb effect becomes 21% more intense than the dew point effect. • The effectiveness of the wet bulb is increased by increasing the velocity at which air enters it. When the input air velocity is 2.5 m/s, the effectiveness of wet bulbs at 35oC Tdi is increased by 26.2%. • A range of parameters, including ventilation, temperature, and relative humidity, were taken into account when considering both sensible and latent heat enhancement. Three interdependent variables must be in balance in the context of refrigeration: air temperature, air velocity, and dry-bulb air temperature.
Share and Cite
JAVANJAL, V.K.; GADHAVE, S.; PATIL, L.N.; MAHAJAN, K.A.; JADHAV, S.S. Efficiency improvement of semi-evaporative cooling systems through environmental analysis. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2025, Vol. 43, pp. 1113-1123. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2025.00108

