Experimental study of temperature changes in a solar chimney
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Journal of Thermal Engineering 2025, Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 464-475; doi.org/10.14744/thermal.0000927
Abstract
Keywords: Absorber Temperature; Ambient Temperature; Collector Temperature; Mathematical Models; Solar Chimney; Solar Radiation
Introduction
With the increase in population and the advancement of living standards, energy has become more and more necessary. The shift towards clean (renewable) energies can be attributed to their clean nature, limitless supply, and growing competitiveness [1, 2]. These energies differ primarily from fossil energies in that they are abundant, diverse, and have global application potential. Likewise, renewable energies produce neither polluting emissions nor greenhouse gases responsible for climate change [2-4]. Their expenses
are likewise going down at a reasonable rate. Currently scientific research is now focusing more on clean and renewable energy technologies. Solar energy is one of the most promising ones. Several technologies have been developed to use and turn this energy into electricity [2, 5, 6]. Some of these technologies have achieved great commercial success, such as photovoltaic [2, 5]. The IEA (International Energy Agency) predicts that the proportion of renewable energy in the world’s electricity supply will rise from 28.7% (2021) to 43% (2030) [7]. Likewise, two-thirds of
*Corresponding author. *E-mail address: razika.ihaddadene@univ-msila.dz This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Editor-in-Chief Ahmet Selim Dalkılıç Published by Yıldız Technical University Press, İstanbul, Turkey Yıldız Technical University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
this increase in electricity demand during this period will be ensured by the development of wind and photovoltaic technologies) [7]. Another technology using solar radiation for electricity generation is the solar chimney [2, 4, 6]. The solar chimney has particular benefits, such as not requiring additional energy sources like gas or water, and having the ability to generate power both during the day and at night [8-10]. Researchers have recently become interested in the solar chimney, which is less common than PV system and have a poor efficiency. The solar chimney and photovoltaic systems are both applications of solar energy used for electricity production. The photovoltaic systems convert solar energy directly into electrical energy. However, the solar chimney produces electricity in an indirect manner by converting solar radiation into kinetic energy by air, which is subsequently converted into electrical energy in a turbine generator. The solar chimney has the advantage of being able to store solar energy during the day and thus produce energy during the day and at night, whereas the PV system produces it only during the day. Solar chimney has a little maintenance fees [11]. It is seen as a realistic and economical choice that can help developing nations with their energy demands [12]. Recently, the exploitation and use of solar chimneys have grown significantly due to their simplicity and wide application potential [4]. The three main components of the solar chimney are the collector, the chimney, and the power conversion unit (one or several turbines). Solar radiation passes through the transparent cover of the collector and heats the absorber, thus increasing its temperature. When the absorber is heated, the temperature of the air increases following thermal convection, which leads to a reduction in its density, and thus the air circulates towards the chimney through the turbine generator and produces electricity. The resulting air escapes into the atmosphere through the top of the chimney. The Manzanares prototype, which was the first solar chimney prototype built, produced 50 kW of electricity for 8 continuous years, confirming the possibility of this technology. Haff et al. [13-14] evaluated the experimental and early test results of this system. Then the analysis and numerical modeling of this power plant with features of heat transmission under the collector were performed by Bernardes et al. [15]. With more research done on this topic, there has been a trend in the recent years to study of the effects of geometric and environmental parameters on the solar chimney using theoretical, experimental and CFD studies. A solar chimney’s performance is influenced by a number of factors, which can be divided into three categories: climatic factors, geometric factors, and design-related factors. The climatic factors such as solar radiations, ambient temperature and wind speed are unique to the study’s region [16]. Two different points of view have been documented based on research done on how ambient temperature affects the performance of solar chimneys. The first opinion shows
that the ambient temperature has a negative impact on the solar chimney’s performance [17-20], whereas the second opinion confirms a favorable impact [21-23]. Using a novel three-dimensional axisymmetric computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, adapted to the Manzanares solar chimney, Cuce et al. (2020) [20] look at how ambient temperature affects the power produced by the solar chimney. The produced power decreases as the temperature rises (for a constant solar radiation intensity of 1000 W/m2) according to a linear regression (R²=0.998). Similar results were presented by other studies [24-25]. It has been observed that power generation rises as radiation and ambient temperature rise [21]. The solar radiation has a positive effect on solar chimney performance [17, 21-23, 26]. Using the Manzanares solar chimney, Cuce et al. (2020) [20] introduced a novel three-dimensional axisymmetric computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. This study looks at how solar radiation intensity affects solar power plants that produce electricity. A precise model was developed that demonstrated a linear relationship between output power and solar radiation intensity. It had a high correlation coefficient (0.9914), and with an increase in solar radiation, power output rises. Furthermore, the performance of a chimney solar system is positively impacted by wind speed [27]. In general, the solar chimney performance depends on various geometric factors, including collector diameter, collector height, chimney diameter, chimney height. Based on these factors, researchers performed out comprehensive studies to change solar chimney systems, with a focus on optimizing the system geometry [9, 28-37]. The effect of the change in the collector radius on the system’s performance parameters, such as temperature, air flow rate, efficiency, and power output, has been repeatedly analyzed by many researchers [9, 28-30]. The majority of the time, mathematical modeling or numerical simulation is used in studies on how the collector radius affects the solar chimney’s performance [32]. Recently Sen et al. [30] presents a complete study on the effect of collector diameter on the temperature rise in the collector, maximum velocity, masse flow rate, power output and efficiency. This study was performed on Manzanares geometry using a CFD model. The findings show that the temperature rise in the collection and the collector diameter have a linear connection. As the collector radius increases, the power output increases exponentially. A linear relationship between collector radius and temperature rise in the collector was presented. Collector radius tends to increase mass flow and maximum air speed. Another crucial geometric factor that influences the performance of a solar chimney is the collector height. It influences the surface of the air flow and the amount of solar energy that reaches the ground [31]. A CFD model was developed by Ayadi et al. [32] to study the impact of collector height on temperature, pressure, and velocity distribution. The results indicated a negative effect of increasing the collector height (at a constant ambient temperature and solar radiation) on the chimney inlet velocity and the
power output. Likewise, Toghraie et al. [9], using a simulation study, presented a negative effect of increasing the collector height (at a constant ambient temperature and solar radiation) on the power output, efficiency, pressure, and temperature change of the system. The chimney diameter is also considered as an important factor that affects the output power and efficiency of the solar chimney. It has been observed that better performance was typically achieved with larger diameters. However, there is an optimal value for increasing the chimney diameter [32-34]. The chimney creates a pressure difference due to its height. This increase in chimney height reduces air pressure, increases air velocity, and therefore increases flow. Increasing the air flow increases the power delivered by the solar chimney and the system efficiency. Since the chimney is the system’s motor, raising the chimney height enhances solar chimney performance [9, 35-37]. A CFD model was created by Shahi et al. [37] using Manzanares’ geometry. They highlighted that raising the system’s chimney height would raise the power output, mass flow, turbine pressure drop, and turbine input speed. A CFD model for two distinct collector radiuses was created by Toghraie et al. [9]. They demonstrated that raising the chimney height while maintaining a constant ambient temperature and radiation intensity will boost power output, efficiency, pressure differential, and mass flow. Recently, Cuce et al. [25], using a CFD model, quantifies the effect of stack height on system efficiency by studying the Manzanares pilot plant. They developed mathematical models relating the height of the solar chimney to the pressure difference, maximum speed, mass flow, power output and efficiency of the solar chimney. The last parameter is related to the design (convergent, vertical and divergent) of the collector and chimney of the power plant. The chimney design has been considered as a parameter that affects the chimney performance. Different configuration was reported in the literature; cylindrical, convergent, and divergent. The divergent-shape was reported to be the best one and an optimum divergent angle was considered by many researchers [38, 41]. The collector slope (negative or positive) has an impact on the chimney performance. Nevertheless, higher slopes tend to result in more vortex formation, which raises losses and lowers efficiency. It has been reported that, down to a certain level, positive slopes improve performance [32, 42-45]. Following all the works cited in the literature, all the studies are based on the temperature of the fluid itself. In this study, our research focuses on the changes in the absorber and collector temperatures, which raise the air’s temperature and cause it to move in the direction of the chimney. Likewise, the effects of climatic conditions (solar radiation and ambient temperature) on the mean temperature of the collector and the mean temperature of the absorber are studied. Mathematical models that describe the variation of the mean temperature of the absorber and the collector as a function of both solar radiation and ambient temperature
were proposed. This study presents an experimental investigation of a solar chimney prototype with a data acquisition system that was developed at the University of M’sila. This paper is divided into four sections. The first presents an introduction, followed by materials and methods, which describe the prototype of the solar chimney, the data acquisition system, and the experimental procedure. The third section focuses on the results and their discussion, and finally, a conclusion closes this study.
Materials And Methods
Description of the Solar Chimney Prototype At the University of M’sila in Algeria, a small-scale solar chimney prototype was built in order to conduct research on solar energy chimneys. As seen in Figure 1, it consists of two fundamental parts: the chimney tower and the collector. The collector is made up of two parallel disks with the same diameter (79 cm), and the distance between the two disks is 10.5 cm. The lower disk is made of steel and presents the absorber, and the upper disk is made of Plexiglas (with an opening) to capture the most solar radiation. With a height of 1.39 m and a diameter of 7.5 cm, the solar tower is embedded in Plexiglas. It is constructed of PVC plastic tube. A number of ten (10) temperature sensors were used to measure the temperatures on the collector and absorber at various locations shown in Figure 2. They are placed exactly 7.15 cm from one sensor to the next one on the absorber and collector, respectively. As shown in Figure 2, the five sensors placed in the collector are situated at different diameters: 3.75 cm (S5), 10.90 cm (S4), 18.05 cm (S3), 25.20 cm (S2), and 32.35 cm (S1), respectively. Five additional temperature sensors are positioned on the absorber in the same plane and locations as the collector.
Figure 2. Temperature sensor placement in the solar chimney. Data Acquisition System Ten temperature sensors (Type D518B20) measuring the temperature in the range of -55° to 125°C with an accuracy of 0.1°C were used to measure temperatures at the different points mentioned above. Two digital acquisition systems composed mainly of Arduino boards and five temperature sensors were designed (Fig. 3). They allow temperature values to be recorded every minute. They are used to capture the temperature values on the collector and on the absorber.
The wind speed is measured using an anemometer (PCS X Wind Speed Sensor), as seen in Figure 4. It moves at
0.1. m/s in resolution. Similarly, the amount of solar energy
collected on the collector surface is measured using a hand pyranometer (489020 type pyranometer), as illustrated in Figure 4. It has an accuracy of ± 5% and a measuring range of 0–1999 W/m². In addition, an additional temperature sensor of the same kind as the one mentioned earlier is used to measure ambient temperature. An Arduino board was used to record the ambient temperature, wind speed, and sun radiation values every minute during the test period. Experimental Procedure The experiments were carried out at the University of Mohamed Khider in Biskra (Algeria). The city of Biskra
is located in the north of the Algerian Sahara, at the foot of the Aurès massif and the Zab Mountains. It is situated at 34°51‘ North, 5° 44’ East, and at an altitude of -120 m. Biskra has an arid climate. The climate of Biskra is hot desert, with long, intense summers and moderate winters [46]. In Biskra, the average temperature is 21.1°C. There is 125 mm of precipitation on average every year. [46]. On May 9, 2022, tests on the solar chimney were conducted to determine the change of the mean temperatures of the collector and the absorber as a function of climatic variables (Tamb and G). Using the suggested acquisition techniques, the values of ambient temperature, solar radiation, and ten temperature measurements (five on the collector and five on the absorber) were taken once every minute.
Results And Discussion
Variation of Solar Radiation and Ambient Temperature Figure 5 shows the change of both ambient temperature and solar radiation during the length of the experiment on May 9, 2022. The solar radiation changes from the beginning of the experiment, with a value of 416.51 W/m 2 recorded at 10:30, to its highest value of 959.76 W/m2 recorded at midday (12:30). The ambient temperature rises during this time; it reaches a maximum value of 32.67°C at 14:50 and a minimum value of 23.1°C at 8:30. Change of Collector and Absorber Temperatures as a Function of Time The temperature variations on the collector and the absorber as a function of the diameter are illustrated,
respectively, in Figures 6 and 7. In both cases (collector and absorber), all temperatures (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) have the same form. As a result of solar radiation passing through the collector and being absorbed by the absorber, the absorber temperature values are higher than those indicated on the collector, as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. The highest temperatures on the absorber and collector are presented for the greatest solar radiation intensity. The collector (or absorber) temperatures are a function of the radius of the collector (or absorber); they increase with decreasing radius, as shown in Figures 6 and 7. T1 temperatures have the lowest values, and T5 temperatures have the highest values. T4Abs and T5Abs temperatures are almost identical.
Relationship Between the Mean Collector and Absorber Temperatures The variation of the mean temperatures on the collector and on the absorber over the tested period is presented in Figure 8. It should be considered that the mean temperature is the mean of the temperatures presented for each case (collector and absorber). The mean temperature change of the collector and absorber follows the same pattern as solar radiation. The maximum values are recorded at 12:10 p.m.: 45.64°C for the collector and 58.44°C for the absorber, respectively. Over the duration of the experiment, the mean absorber temperature is always higher than the mean collector temperature. The temperature difference between the absorber and collector varies with time, reaching
Figure 8. The mean temperatures (collector and the absorber) over time.
a maximum of 13.98°C at 11:10 a.m. and a minimum of 07.08°C at 8:30 a.m. The absorber mean temperature (Tmabs) increases with the increase in the collector mean temperature (Tmcol), and they are correlated according to a polynomial law as presented in Eq. 1, with a coefficient of determination of 0.98. (1)
Operating Conditions Effect of the Mean Temperatures of the Collector and the Absorber The effects of ambient temperature and solar radiation on the mean temperature of the collector are illustrated in Figures 9 and Figure 10. As presented, the mean temperature of the collector increases with increasing ambient temperature. (Tamb) according to the following relation:
(2) This mathematical model has a very good coefficient of determination of 0.96. This justifies the effect of ambient temperature on the mean collector temperature. Likewise, the increase in solar radiation (G) received on the surface of the collector increases the mean temperature of the collector; it follows a law similar to the effect of ambient temperature as presented in Eq.3, with a coefficient of determination of 0.954. The calculated R2 value confirms the impact of solar radiation on the mean collector temperature and provides a suitable illustration of the model that is suggested for the collector’s mean temperature progression.
Figure 9. Ambient temperature effect on the mean collector temperature.
Figure 10. Solar radiation effect on the mean collector temperature.
As mentioned previously, two models of the change of Tmcol as a function of Tamb and G respectively have been proposed. Another model of the change of Tmcol as a function of these two variables (Tamb and G) is proposed using Matlab software. It is of the form: (4) This model has a very good coefficient of determination (0.981) and a root mean square error (RMSE) value of 0.61°C, which validates this model for the prediction of the mean collector temperature as a function of ambient temperature and solar radiation. The modeled values for the mean temperature of the collector agree with the experimentally recorded values, as shown in Figure 11. The effects of ambient temperature and solar radiation on the mean absorber temperature are illustrated in Figures 12 and 13. It is considered that increasing solar radiation
and ambient temperature increases the mean absorber temperature. The amount of radiation that passes through the glazing increases as solar radiation rises, increasing the amount of heat absorbed by the absorber. This results in an increase in the absorber’s temperature. Increasing the ambient temperature increases the temperature of the collector and thus increases the heat exchange (radiation) between the collector and the absorber, and therefore the temperature of the absorber increases. Therefore, the absorber temperature increases with increasing solar radiation and ambient temperature, and thus the air temperature, the collector temperature difference, and the power and efficiency of the chimney increase. This is in agreement with the results of the literature [20, 22–23]. Noting that the Tmabs change as a function of Tamb and the Tmabs change as a function of G can be summarized in the form of a mathematical expression as follows:
Figure 11. Comparison of experimental and modeled mean collector temperatures.
Figure 12. Ambient temperature effect on the mean Absorber temperature.
Figure 13. Solar radiation effect on the mean absorber temperature.
Figure 14. Comparison of experimental and modeled mean absorber temperatures.
(6) In a similar manner, a model of change of the mean temperature of the absorber as a function of environmental conditions (G, Tamb) is established: (7) This model’s coefficient of determination (0.979) and its root mean square error (RMSE) (0.664°C), making it valid for predicting the mean absorber temperature in relation to ambient temperature and solar radiation. Figure 14 shows a comparison between the model’s values and experimental
values for the mean absorber temperature. There is good agreement between these values, which supports the proposed model.
Conclusion
In this experimental study, the effects of ambient temperature and solar radiation on the mean temperature of the absorber (Tmab) and the collector (Tmcol) were examined. A solar chimney prototype has been constructed at the University of Msila in order to achieve this goal. This prototype has a collector diameter of 0.79 m, a collector height of 0.105 m, a tower diameter of 0.075 m, and a tower height of 1.39 m. Additionally, the ability to gather data every minute was developed through the use of data collecting devices (temperature, solar radiation, wind speed) coupled to Arduino boards. The research conducted throughout this study allowed us to retain the following points:
1. There is dependence between Tmab and Tmcol temperatures; they are related with a polynomial law with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.98.
2. The Tmcol is dependent on both ambient temperature
and solar radiation. A mathematical model which describes the evolution of the mean collector temperature as a function of solar radiation and ambient temperature has been developed. It follows a polynomial law with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.9811 and a root mean square error (RMSE) value of 0.61°C.
3. The Tmab is also affected by ambient temperature and
solar radiation. A mathematical model has been established to explain how the mean collector temperature changes in relation to solar radiation and ambient temperature. It obeys a polynomial law with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.979 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.664°C. The increase in the air temperature in the collector leads to an increase in: the air temperature difference (the outlet minus the inlet) in the collector; the air circulation speed in the solar chimney; and the power and efficiency of the solar chimney. It is essential to increase the absorber temperature to achieve this goal. As presented in this study, the increase in ambient temperature and solar radiation increases the temperature of the absorber and thus increases the performance of the solar chimney. Likewise, the materials used in the construction of the absorber and the collector also have an impact on the air temperature in the chimney and, thus, on the performance of the solar chimney.
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data that supports the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Conflict Of Interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethics
There are no ethical issues with the publication of this manuscript.
References
- Ahmed R, Waseem S, Ahmed S, Eldin AS, Omar L, Numerical study of vertical solar chimneys with Amira E, et al. Solar chimney power plants: a mini moist air in a hot and humid climate. Int J Heat Mass review. Future Eng J 2022;3:4. [CrossRef] Transf 2016;102:645-656. [CrossRef] 474 J Ther Eng, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 464−475, March, 2025
- Dai YJ, Huang HB, Wang RZ. Case study of solar chimney power plants in Northwestern regions of K, Hasanuzzaman M, et al. Solar chimney power China. Renew Energy 2003;28:1295-1304. [CrossRef] plants: a review of the concepts, designs and perfor-
- Zhou X, Wang F, Fan J, Ochieng RM. Performance mances. Sustainability 2022;14:1450. [CrossRef] of solar chimney power plant in Qinghai-Tibet [32] Ayadi A, Bouabidi A, Driss Z, Abid MS. Experimental Plateau. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14:2249- and numerical analysis of the collector roof height 2255. [CrossRef] effect on the solar chimney performance. Renew
- Kasaeian AB, Amirifard M, Ahmadi MH, Kasaeian Energy 2018;115:649-662. [CrossRef] F. Investigation of the effects of ambient temperature [33] Guo P, Li J, Wang Y, Wang Y. Numerical study on the and dimensional parameters on the performance performance of a solar chimney power plant. Energy of solar chimney power plants. Int J Low Carbon Convers Manag 2015;105:197-205. [CrossRef] Technol 2017;12:335-348. [CrossRef] [34] Hamdan MO. Analytical thermal analysis of solar
- Cuce E, Cuce PM, Sen H. A thorough perfor- chimney power plant. Proceedings of the 4th ASME mance assessment of solar chimney power plants: International Conference on Sustainable Energy Case study for Manzanares. Clean Eng Technol (ES2010), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17-22 May 2010. pp. 2020;100026. [CrossRef] 451-455. [CrossRef]
- Larbi S, Bouhdjar A, Chergui T. Performance analy- sis of a solar chimney power plant in the southwest- utilizing chimney discrete model. Renew Energy ern region of Algeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;56:50-54. [CrossRef] 2010;14:470-477. [CrossRef] [36] Ayadi A, Driss Z, Bouabidi A, Nasraoui H, Bsisa
- Asnaghi A, Ladjevardi SM. Solar chimney power M, Abid MS. A computational and an experimental plant performance in Iran. Renew Sustain Energy study on the effect of the chimney height on the ther- Rev 2012;16:3383-3390. [CrossRef] mal characteristics of a solar chimney power plant.
- Ayli UE, Özgirgin E, Tareq M. Solar chimney power Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E 2018;232:503-516. [CrossRef] plant performance for different seasons under vary- [37] Shahi DVV, Gupta MA, Nayak MVS. CFD analysis ing solar irradiance and temperature distribution. J of solar chimney wind power plant by Ansys Fluent. Energy Resourc Tech 2021;143:4048533. [CrossRef] Int J Technol Res Eng 2018;5:3746-3751.
- Dhahri A, Omri A, Orfi J. Numerical study of a solar chimney power plant. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol H. Numerical and experimental study of the impact 2014;8:1953-1965. [CrossRef] of conical chimney angle on the thermodynamic
- Cuce E, Sen H, Cuce PM. Numerical perfor- characteristics of a solar chimney power plant. Proc mance modelling of solar chimney power plants: Inst Mech Eng Part E 2019;233:1185-1199. [CrossRef] Influence of chimney height for a pilot plant in [39] Das P, Chandramohan VP. 3D numerical study on Manzanares, Spain. Sustain Energy Technol Assess estimating flow and performance parameters of solar 2020;39:100704. [CrossRef] updraft tower (SUT) plat: Impact of divergent angle
- Ihaddadene R, Ihaddadene N, Guerira B. A simu- of chimney; ambient temperature, solar flux and lation study of the impact of solar radiation on the turbine efficiency. J Clear Prod 2020;256:120353. solar chimney. 2nd International Conference on [CrossRef] Engineering, Natural and Social Sciences, 4-6 April [40] Ohya Y, Wataka M, Watanabe K, Uchida T. 2023, Konya, Türkiye. Laboratory experiment and numerical analysis of a
- Milad S. Comprehensive mathematical study new type of solar tower efficiently generating a ther- on solar chimney powerplant, Renew Energy mal updraft. Energies 2016;9:1077. [CrossRef] 2021;175:470-485. [CrossRef] [41] Hassan A, Ali M, Waqas A. Numerical investiga-
- Karimipour-Fard P, Beheshti H. Performance tion on performance of solar chimney power plant enhancement and environmental impact analysis by varying collector slope and chimney diverging of a solar chimney power plant: Twenty-four-hour angle. Energy 2018;142:411-425. [CrossRef] simulation in climate condition of Isfahan province, [42] Cuce E, Cuce PM, Sen H, Sudhakar K, Berardi U, Iran. Int J Eng 2017;30:1260-1269. Serencam U. Impacts of ground slope on main per-
- Yapıcı E, Özgirgin AE, Osama N. Numerical investi- formance figures of solar chimney power plants: A gation on the performance of a small scale solar chim- comprehensive CFD research with experimental ney power plant for different geometrical parameters. validation. Int J Photoenergy 2021;2021:6612222. J Clean Product 2020:276:122908. [CrossRef] [CrossRef]
- Sen H, Cuce PM, Cuce E. Impacts of collector radius and height on performance parameters of solar chim- Simulation and optimization of geometric parame- ney power plants: A case study for Manzanares, Spain. ters of a solar chimney in Tehran. Energy Convers RTE University J Sci Eng 2021;2:83-104. [CrossRef] Manag 2014;83:28-34. [CrossRef] J Ther Eng, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 464−475, March, 2025 475
- Patel SK, Prasad D, Ahmed MR. Computational thermal performance of a solar chimney with dif- studies on the effect of geometric parameters on the ferent dimensional parameters. Renew Energy performance of a solar chimney power plant. Energy 2016;91:477-483. [CrossRef] Convers Manag 2014;77:424-431. [CrossRef]
- Ghalamchi M, Kasaeian A, Ghalamchi M, Mirzahosseini AH. An experimental study on the org/wiki/Biskra. Accessed Feb 20, 2024.
Share and Cite
SEMANE, A.; IHADDADENE, R.; BEDJEGHIT, E.; GUERIRA, B.; IHADDADENE, N. Experimental study of temperature changes in a solar chimney. Journal of Thermal Engineering 2025, Vol. 11, pp. 464-475. https://doi.org/10.14744/thermal.0000927

