YTUP
Journals
About
Services
Guides
Sign InSubmit Article
HomeJournalsJournal of Thermal Engineering10.47481/jten.0036
JoJournal of Thermal Engineering
Get Alerted Download PDF
AbstractKeywords1. IntroductionOutputOutput4. Conclusion89. MPa [39,40]. Their approach provided granular regional analysisAcknowledgement16. Nov 2018, 384-387, (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ReferencesShare and CiteRelated Articles
Article Open Access1 January 2026

Structural and thermal analysis of poly ether ether ketone aluminium composites through finite elem

Order Reprints Cite Share

Senkathir Sangli1, and Sumit Pramanik1

1SRM Institute of Science and Technology

Journal of Thermal Engineering 2026, Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 1368-1380; doi.org/10.47481/jten.0036

Download PDF View DOI record

Abstract

Increasing automotive usage drives exploration of polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials rather than conventional metals, such as aluminum (Al), for engine pistons and valve plates, to reduce mass and fuel consumption. The PMC materials generally offer many advantages but have poor thermal properties. Since poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) offers superior mechanical properties and thermal stability among thermoplastics, it can be used as a matrix in combination with conventional Al. However, the PEEK-Al composite has not been studied yet, either by simulation or experiment, for these engine parts. In the present study, a novel PEEK-Al composite system was designed, with Al content varying from 10–40 vol%, to identify the composition that yields the optimal mechanical and thermal properties. A structural and thermal analysis was performed using finite element analysis (FEA) in ANSYS. The present results were compared to determine the optimal composite compositions based on their thermomechanical properties. From the entire present FEA results, it is concluded that the PEEK-40%Al has best overall optimum mechanical (i.e., up to 1.056×107 Pa shear stress for Plate and 8.815×107 Pa shear stress for piston) and heat transfer (i.e., up to 2590.3 W/m2 heat flux for Plate and 74.939 W/m2 for Piston) characteristics for plate and piston materials. Hence, PEEK-40%Al, which has the best heat-transfer characteristics, can be applied to both engine plates and piston components. Hence, these PEEK-Al composites will enhance engine efficiency and align with automotive sustainability goals.

Keywords: Aluminum; poly (ether ether ketone); finite element analysis; temperature; simulation; composite

1. Introduction

The automotive industry increasingly investigates polymeric materials to achieve lower weight than traditional metallic aluminum (Al). Conventional materials cannot withstand the high temperatures generated in internal combustion (IC) engines. A piston is a cylindrical component of an engine that undergoes reciprocating motion. The piston is contained within a cylinder, which is airtight owing to the piston rings. As a liquid or gas within the cylinder expands and contracts, the piston moves inside it. With the help of a piston, thermal energy can be converted into mechanical work and vice versa [1]. The circular plates or rings that make up the compressor

valve plate are layered between the valve seat and the cover. The rings or plates are drawn towards the area of higher pressure when there is a pressure difference, and they use springs to return to their closed position when the pressure equalizes [2]. Al alloys are widely used in the manufacture of pistons. Al is an excellent conductor of heat and electricity. It is nontoxic, and has low density, excellent, corrosion resistance, and high thermal conductivity, and can be cast, machined and molded quickly [3]. In this context, many researchers have investigated various engine components using different technologies. Sun et al., 2024 [4] described a simulation of hardness plug and thermocouple sensors on an Al-alloy piston-based IC engine and the chamber’s heat transmission boundary condi-

Corresponding Author E-mail Adress: senkaths@srmist.edu.in *

Submitted: 04 July 2025 ; Accepted: 11 January 2026 This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Editor-in-Chief Ahmet Selim Dalkılıç Published by Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

tion. They reported that heat capacity affects fluctuation error and density, and that heat conductivityand time-averaged error are all products of heat capacity. They suggested a method for correcting fluctuation errors. In this context, modification of Al-based materials has been attempted for getting better heat-transfer performance using Al-layered structures as thermal protection system for future flight vehicles [5]. Furthermore, the thermal stresses and heat transfer produced have been tried to investigate numerically where Al, copper (Cu), structural steel, and titanium (Ti) were selected as a solid substrate [6]. Dash et al., 2023 [7] studied structural Al-Si alloy production, structure, and mechanical characteristics for aerospace and automotive usage. Computational modelling and integration of artificial intelligence are key areas for their future research. Additionally, it is non-magnetic and non-sparking in nature. Al is the sixth most malleable and second-most ductile metal [9]. However, a huge number of Al pistons is damaged due to different reasons including, wear and tear, temperature, and mechanical fatigue [10,11]. In addition, compared to wear and mechanical fatigue damage, the engine pistons or compressor valve plates damaged more due to thermal and mechanical stresses [12]. In this context, composites may be a better option for improving thermomechanical properties. Du et al., 2024 [8] explored to improvise the diesel engine performance by applying ‘thermal swing’ via plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) technique. However, it has some drawbacks, such as a slow response to temperature changes and elevated surface temperatures. In this context, poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) could be a great potential option due to its high melting temperature (345 °C) lesser weight with high mechanical properties [13]. The chemical formula of PEEK is [-C6H4-O-C6H4-O-C6H4-CO-]n. It is a colourless organic thermo-plastic polymer belongs to the poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK)family and used in many engineering applications. The PEEK polymer was first developed in November 1978 [14]. It exhibits high volume resistivity and high surface resistivity. This rigid opaque (grey) material offers a unique combination of mechanical properties, resistance to chemicals, wear, fatigue and creep as well as exceptionally high temperature resistance, up to 260 °C (working temperature) [15,16]. PEEK is a tough, semi-crystalline, high-performance thermoplastic polymer, and has good biocompatibility, thermal and mechanical properties [13,17–19]. Therefore, recently, the PEEK-based composites are being explored for different engineering applications and biomedical applications [20–22]. Researchers are thus taking interest on its thermal and mechanical studies for different engine parts in automobile sector [23,24]. Yan et al., 2025 [25] examined a piston failure at extreme heat and pressure conditions. The distribution of stress fields and temperatures within an Al-Si alloy piston was simulated using finite element analysis(FEA).Fatigue failure most likely occurred in the throat region. Cracks in the Al matrixcaused by the hard particlesaccelerated thermal fatigue. This research lays the groundwork for a model to predict the experimentally determined lifetimes of Al-Si alloy

pistons. To optimize the thermal properties of the piston design while keeping costs down, it helped to investigate thermal stress distribution using finite element method (FEM) before developing prototypes [26]. Vaidya et al., 2023 [27] optimised the design requirements of composite connecting rods using engineering carbon fibre thermoplastics to meet the 14,000 N load and 1 mm maximum deflection. Iterative optimisations were performed on the rods to improve their geometry, wall thickness, and load-bearing surfaces. The optimized composite connecting rod was projected to be 78% lighter than the incumbent steel component, and material and shape optimization enabled the design to exceed the 14,000 N requirement. In this context, polymers are lighter, whereas metals or alloys are heavier. Although some polymers, including PEEK, have excellent mechanical properties, they are not as good as metals, such as aluminium, in terms of thermal properties. Indeed, the compressor valve plate and piston, made of PEEK-Al composites, have not yet been examined experimentally or by simulation. To investigate the effectiveness of PEEK-Al composites in engine pistons and compressor valve plates, this study aims, for the first time, to develop a model of these composites with varying quantities of aluminium-particle reinforcement. It is expected that the PEEK-Al would have better heat transfer characteristics whether used as a piston or a plate since a recent study provided empirical evidence of this composite’s feasibility [28]. Few finite element modelling studies of compressor valve plates have been reported to date. For this reason, appropriate simulation work may enable improvements in engine component design through finite element analysis (FEA) of the engine plate and piston, potentially facilitating their application in internal combustion engines, thereby achieving improved reliability and efficiency. T herefore, in the present modeling study, PEEK is selected to be used for making of an engine piston and a compressor valve plate owing to its desirable mechanical properties and higher melting temperature beside lightweight [15,22]. The low density of PEEK composites can significantly reduce fuel consumption. However, because of its semi-crystalline nature, blending this polymer with other thermoplastics and thermosetting polymers(resins)is challenging. Although PEEK has good mechanical properties, it exhibits poorer thermal properties than Al. Thus, the present study aims to model PEEK-based composites with variable amounts of Al-particle reinforcement to investigate the performance of PEEK/Al composite-based engine pistons and compressor valve plates. Compared with conventional metals, PEEK/aluminium composites reduce component mass, thereby lowering emissions and fuel consumption in IC engines. The study further maps various Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs)related to energy efficiency and sustainability in the automotive sector. Specifically, this present study will (i) emphasize improved thermal management in engine components, leading to reduced energy use for SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), (ii) include the innovation fostered by advanced PEEK/Al composites, which will enhance manufacturing resilience and sustainability for SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), (iii) focus on

decreasing material usage and promoting energy-saving production methods through the use of lighter composites for SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption, and Production), and finally, (iv) produce the environmental benefits of weight reduction in parts, translating to lower fuel demand and significant carbon dioxide (CO2) savings for SDG 13 (Climate Action).

2.2. Components design in solidworks

2.2.1. Compressor valve plate model A model of the compressor valve plate (hereafter referred to as the ‘plate’), drawn in SolidWorks v.17, is shown in Figure 1.

Therefore, for the first time, a novel composite system consisting of PEEK and Al was designed, with Al content varying from 10–40% by volume, to determine the optimal mechanical and thermal properties of the PEEK-Al composites. Hence, this study may be particularly useful for the design and development of engine parts based on composite materials, such as pistons and plates. In the present study, ‘Al’ denotes ‘pure Al’ and ‘PEEK-Al’ denotes ‘composites.’

2.1. Materials

In the present study, PEEK was combined with different volume percentages of Al to produce composites with compositions of 90% PEEK and 10% Al (denoted PEEK-10%Al), 80% PEEK and 20% Al (denoted PEEK-20%Al), 70% PEEK and 30% Al (denoted PEEK30%Al), and 60% PEEK and 40% Al (denoted PEEK-40%Al) for use in an IC engine piston (named ‘piston’) and a compressor valve plate (named ‘plate’). This composite is feasible in practice since we recently developed PEEK/Al composites in which Al content varied from 10 to 40 % [28]. The input properties of the composites were evaluated using the rule of mixtures and used as input for the FEA performed in ANSYS software v.18. ANSYS was used to perform structural and thermal analyses; subsequently, samples exhibiting favorable properties were identified and compared. The total deformation, equivalent elastic strain, shear stress, temperature, and total heat flux of the two modeled components for all designed PEEK/Al composites were simulated. The physical and mechanical properties of aluminum and PEEK obtained from the literatures [29,30] are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1. Physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of pristine aluminum and pure PEEK materials Materials

Tensile yield strength (MPa) Compressive yield strength (MPa) Tensile ultimate strength (MPa) Isotropic thermal conductivity (W/mK) Specific heat (J/kg K)

Figure 1. Compressor valve plate (i.e., shortly named as ‘plate’) drawn in SolidWorks

2.2.2. Engine piston model A model of an engine piston (hereafter referred to as ‘piston’), drawn in SolidWorks v.17, is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Engine piston (i.e., shortly named as ‘piston’) drawn in SolidWorks

2.3. Thermal analysis for compressor valve plate and engine

piston 2.3.1. Temperature Temperature distributions of the Al-based plate and PEEK-based piston are depicted in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. In pure Al or PEEK, the highest temperature occurred at the center of the plate, and the lowest occurred at the periphery. On the other hand, in pure Al or PEEK, the highest temperature was obtained at the top of the piston, and the lowest at the piston bottom (piston skirt). The maximum (MAX) and minimum (MIN) temperature distributions for the Al- and PEEK-based plate and piston are illustrated in Table 2.

In this FEA study, a 1 s step size was used, as noted in Figures 3 to 6, for the following purposes: (i) improving accuracy in capturing transient effects, (ii) stabilizing the solution, and (iii) tracking sensitive responses. The time step of 1 s indicates the increment used for the applied parameters. The 1-s time step permits the simulation to record rapid changes in temperature, displacement, or stress more accurately, predictably, and precisely, especially during transient thermal events or thermal shocks. A finer time step also helps maintain numerical stability by reducing the risk of missing critical changes or introducing errors caused by an excessively large time step. When the time step was increased from 1.0 to 2.0 s, the maximum temperature changed significantly. As the time step decreases from 1.0 s to 0.5 s and 0.1 s, the maximum temperature converges, exhibiting an insignificant percentage change. This supports the use of a 1 s time step as accurate and computationally efficient, with an inaccuracy of less than 1.5%. Structural materials are sensitive to temperature gradients or rapid thermal loading, and a finer time step, i.e., 1 s, can more effectively resolve the evolution of thermal strains and stresses. However, using a fine time step of less than one second may increase computational cost, so the time step has been optimized to balance the desired accuracy with available computational resources. The piston temperatures may vary from 100 °C to 300 °C or above [32,33]. Although 100°C is not extremely high, heat transfer and material stresses begin to play significant roles in IC engine design. In this study, we started from the lowest temperature range of the polymer matrix composites.

Figure 4. A temperature distribution for aluminium (A) and PEEK (B) materials-based piston Table 2. Temperature distribution for aluminium and PEEK materials-based plate and piston MIN Temperature MAX Temperature (°C) (°C)

Temperature of PEEK material Temperature of aluminum Temperature of PEEK material

Figure 3. A temperature distribution for aluminium (A) and PEEK (B) materials-based plate

Total heat flux results for the aluminium- and PEEK-based plate and piston are depicted in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. In pure Al or PEEK, the heat flux distribution was also obtained and, similar to the temperature distribution, was highest at the center and lowest at the periphery of the plate. On the other hand, in pure Al or PEEK, the highest heat flux was obtained at the top of the piston, and the lowest at the piston’s bottom or skirt. Total heat flux values of pristine Al-based and pure PEEK-based plate and piston are illustrated in Table 3. Heat flux results indicate that Al exhibits a higher heat flux than PEEK, because Al has a higher thermal conductivity. It also indicates that the heat-flux range of the plate is much higher than

that of the piston. Furthermore, the overall heat flux of the plate is substantially higher than that of the piston.

Table 3. Overall values for total heat flux for plate and piston of pristine Al and pure PEEK Component

2.4. Properties evaluated by rule of mixtures

Figure 5. Total heat flux results for aluminium (A) and PEEK (B) materials-based plate

The rule of mixtures is a technique for approximately estimating the properties of composite materials, assuming that all composites are homogeneous. It predicts the composite property based on the volume-weighted average of the properties of the phases (matrix and dispersed phase) [33]. The rule-of-mixtures equations are widely used to determine the properties of an unknown composite. Here, rule-of-mixture equations are presented in Eqs.1 – 3, which were used to determine the mechanical properties of the composites, where Xuc is a property of the composite, Xuf is a property of the filler, Xm is a property of matrix at the failure strain of the fiber, Vm and Vf are the matrix volume fraction and the filler volume fraction, respectively. Eq. 1 represents a general equation for all composites, whereas Eqs. 2-8 represent specific formulae for different properties. Eqs.9-11 were used to calculate the specific heat capacity of composite (Cp,mix) [34]. The mechanical and thermal properties of all composites are presented in Table 4. X uc = X m Vm + X uf Vf (1)

where, ρ - density of composite, ρAl - density of aluminium, VAl volume fraction of Al, ρP - density of PEEK and Vp - volume fraction of PEEK. Poisson’s ratio: n = n Al VAl + n P VP (3)

where, μ - Poisson’s ratio of composite, μAl - Poisson’s ratio of Al and μP - Poisson’s ratio of PEEK. Young’s modulus: Figure 6. Total heat flux results for aluminium (A) and PEEK (B) materials-based piston

where, E - Young’s modulus of composite, EAl - Young’s modulus of Al and EP - Young’s modulus of PEEK.

where, σyt - tensile yield strength of composite, σAl - tensile yield strength of Al and σP - tensile yield strength of PEEK. Compressive yield strength: v yc = v cAl VAl + v cP VcP (6)

where, σyc - compressive yield strength, v cAl - compressive yield strength of Al and σcp- compressive yield strength of PEEK. Tensile ultimate strength: v uc = v uAl VAl + v uP VP (7)

where, σuc - tensile ultimate strength of composite, σuAl - tensile ultimate strength of Al and σuP - tensile ultimate strength of PEEK. Isotropic thermal conductivity: Isotropic thermal conductivity, K = K Al VAl + K p Vp

where, K - isotropic thermal conductivity of composite, KAl - isotropic thermal conductivity of Al and KP - isotropic thermal conductivity of PEEK. Specific heat: The rule of mixtures presented in Eq.9 for determining the specific heat (Cp,mix) of a two-phase composite is computed by weighted average based on the mass fractions of each phase, assuming that the total energy is conserved and the temperature change is uniform. This Eq.9 is converted from mass fraction to volume fraction and density in Eq.10, where rmix represents the density of the composite, which is expressed in terms of volume fraction and density of individual phases in Eq.11 [35]. C p,mix = (m Al # C p,Al) + (m p # C p,p) (9) (VAl # t Al # C p,Al) + (Vp # t p # C p,p) t mix (VAl # t Al # C p,Al) + (Vp # t p # C p,p) C p,mix = (VAl # t Al) + (Vp # t p)

where, mi = mass fraction of component i, Cp,mix = specific heat capacity of composite (J/kg·K), Vi = volume fraction of component i, ρi = density of component i (kg/m³), Cp,i = specific heat capacity of component i (J/kg·K).

Table 4. Mechanical and thermal properties of all the composites

Density (kg/m ) Young’s modulus (Pa) Poisson’s Ratio Tensile yield strength (MPa) Compressive yield strength (MPa) Tensile ultimate strength (MPa) Isotropic thermal conductivity (W/mK) Specific heat (J/kgK)

2.5. Boundary conditions

For structural analysis, the boundary conditions were determined by finite element analysis (FEA) using Eqs. 1 and 7. For steady-state thermal analysis, the initial and boundary conditions were determined using Eqs.8 and 9 prior to conducting the FEA. We also assumed steady-state, isotropic conditions in this study and neglected creep and fatigue. The environment was assumed to be constant across the different parts of the plate and the piston. The boundary conditions were applied as per the reported works [1,2,23,24,36], where for the compressor valve plate, the center (point 1) was fixed

and a uniformly distributed pressure was applied at the periphery (point 2) as depicted in Figure 7a. In the present study, a pressure of 6 MPa was applied to both the plate and the piston. The meshed model characteristics of the piston in the present study were: element size, 1.8 mm; number of elements, 52077; number of nodes, 13353; and element type, tetrahedral. Because many elements (more than 52000) were used, the selected element size of 1.8 mm is sufficient to accurately capture the geometry and stress distribution of the piston. The tetrahedral elements ensure geometric accuracy and C p,mix = (m Al # C p,Al) + (m p # C p,p) are ideal for intricate geometries, such as pistons. In fact, the findings would be largely consis-

tent with those obtained using a 1.8 mm mesh size if the mesh size were further refined to 1.5 mm or 1.2 mm. Less than 0.15% of the total elements exceeded the upper limit for the aspect ratio. Hence, the current mesh yields mesh-independent results because further refinement would only increase computational cost without appreciably altering the physical predictions. Mesh independence is used to ensure that the mechanical and thermal results of the simulation reflect the underlying physics of the problem rather than depend on mesh density. Mesh independence is achieved when further increasing mesh density (i.e., smaller elements and more nodes) results in changes of less than 4% in the maximum deformation, stress concentration, or thermal behaviour. Consistency between the medium and fine meshes implies mesh independence. This confirms that the simulation setup is robust. Figure 7b depicts the convective boundary conditions applied to the piston at surfaces A–I for the thermal analysis.

Figure 7. The convective boundary conditions of the (a) compressor valve plate and (b) engine piston.

3.1. Structural analysis for compressor valve plate

The distributions of total deformation, equivalent elastic strain, and von Mises shear stress for the plate and piston of all PEEK-Al composites, as well as for pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials, have been evaluated. The MAX values of the total deformation, equivalent elastic strain, and von Mises shear stress distributions for the plate and the piston of all the PEEK-Al composites, along with pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials are plotted in Figures 8 to 10, respectively. T he deformation values are very low, measuring approximately 0.0084 m for the PEEK-20%Al plate component and 0.0012 m for the pure PEEK piston component. The plate exhibited higher deformation and strain than the piston because the plate was thinner. The pristine Al and PEEK samples exhibit minimal deformation. The deformation increases with Al content up to 20%Al in PEEK-Al compositesbut decreases significantly with greater Al particle reinforcement. The composite deforms most at 20%Al, which may reflect a balance between stiffness and ductility. Greater Al-particle reinforcement increases rigidity and reduces deformation. Conversely, the pure PEEK component exhibits the greatest deformation, demonstrating the dominance of the polymer under

piston loading, whereas the pure Al piston exhibits minimal deformation. In PEEK-Al composites, deformation decreases steadily as Al particle reinforcement increases. The inclusion of Al particle reinforcement increases piston stiffness and minimizes deformation. These findings inform the design of composites with optimized mechanical properties for engine components, thereby enhancing performance and durability. For instance, the MAX and MIN values obtained from the total deformation, equivalent elastic strain, and von Mises shear stress distributions for a specific composite (i.e., a PEEK-40%Al plate) are shown in Figures 11 to 13. In the composite, the highest deformation and strain were observed at the plate periphery and the lowest at the plate center. In a similar way, the MAX values were obtained from the distribution images of total deformation, equivalent elastic strain, and von Mises shear stress for other material-based plate and piston components and plotted in Figures 8 to 10. Figure 8 shows that plate deformation is lower in PEEK-30%Al and PEEK-40%Al, whereas it is highest in PEEK-20%Al. Figures 8 and 9 show that the magnitudes of deformation and strain in all piston materials are significantly lower than those in plate materials. The total strain behavior of the plate materials differs from that of the piston materials. On the other hand, Figure 10 shows that the lowest maximum (MAX) shear stress is exhibited by PEEK-10%Al. In contrast, shear stress values were higher for the PEEK-30%Al and PEEK-40%Al composites. As Al vol% in PEEK increased, the MAX value of the total deformation of the PEEK-Al composites in the piston decreased; interestingly, the MAX values of the von Mises shear stress distributions for all PEEK-Al composite materials in the piston increased with Al concentration. Nevertheless, the MAX shear stress was highest for the PEEK-40%Al composite-material-based piston, which closely resembles the Al-based automotive components designed by other researchers [29].

Figure 8. Maximum (MAX) values of the Total deformation of all the PEEK-Al composites along with pristine Al and pure PEEKbased materials for plate and piston

Figure 12. Equivalent elastic strain of PEEK-40%Al composite for plate Figure 9. Maximum (MAX) values of the Equivalent elastic strain of all the PEEK-Al composites along with pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials for plate and piston

3.2. Thermal analysis for compressor valve plate

Figure 10. Maximum (MAX) values of the von Mises Shear stress distributions of all the PEEK-Al composites along with pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials for plate and piston

Figure 11. Total deformation of PEEK-40%Al composite for plate

In the thermal analysis, the temperature and heat-flux distribution results of all the PEEK-Al composite material-based plates and pistons have been analyzed. For instance, the temperature and heat-flux distribution images of a specific PEEK-Al composite, i.e., a PEEK-40%Al plate and piston, are shown in Figures 14–17. The highest temperature and heat flux were obtained at the center of the plate, while the lowest values were obtained at its periphery. The MIN values of temperature and the MAX values of heat flux, obtained from the temperature and heat-flux distribution images of all PEEK-Al composite-based plates and pistons, are shown in Figures 18 and 19. The highest temperature and heat flux were obtained at the top surface of the piston, and the lowest temperature and heat flux were obtained at the bottom surface of the piston. The corresponding MAX and MIN temperature distribution data for the plate and piston based on PEEK-Al composite material are illustrated in Table 5. Similarly, the corresponding MAX and MIN total heat flux values for the PEEK-Al composite-material-based plate and piston are shown in Table 6. It is to be mentioned that the heat transfer rate of the plate and piston was determined by analyzing the heat flux of the materials [37]. In addition, Figure 18 for the piston shows that pure Al has the highest temperature, while the PEEK-40%Al composite shows the lowest temperature. Thus, PEEK-40%Al exhibited the best thermal properties as a piston material. However, in Figure

19, for both the plate and the piston, the PEEK-40%Al composite showed the heat flux. Therefore, PEEK-40%Al exhibited the best heat-transfer characteristics as both plate and piston materials. When the Al volume fraction exceeds 0.4 (40% Al), heat transfer properties may increase due to a higher density of conductive Al particles, but the binding properties of the PEEK matrix may be reduced, thereby diminishing the mechanical integration between the PEEK matrix and Al particles. Hence, they are not included in either engine-plate materials or piston materials.

Figure 17. Total heat flux distribution of PEEK-40%Al composite material-based piston Table 5. Temperature distribution for PEEK-Al composites-based plate and piston

Figure 14. Temperature distribution of PEEK-40%Al composite material-based plate

Output

Figure 15. Total heat flux distribution of PEEK-40%Al composite material-based plate

Table 6. Overall values for total heat flux for plate and piston of PEEK-Al composites

Output

Figure 16. Temperature distribution of PEEK-40%Al composite material-based piston

In addition, the density of the standard Al piston was estimated to be reduced by 21-31% when using these PEEK-Al composites. According to current industry studies, a 21–31% decrease in engine or vehicle mass is often associated with a 13–25% increase in fuel efficiency. These benefits arise because every 10% reduction in mass results in approximately a 6–8% improvement in fuel economy. This gain occurs because a lighter vehicle requires less energy to move, thereby immediately reducing fuel consumption for the same increase in engine performance. Therefore, if the mass of the engine or vehicle is reduced by 21-31%, we may anticipate a gain in fuel economy of approximately 13–17%, given that the performance and other characteristics of the system remain the same.

Figure 18. Minimum (MIN) temperature distributions of all the PEEK-Al composites along with pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials for plate and piston

Furthermore, for Al material, other researchers showed maximum 2 heat flux value of 24838 W/m [41], which is slightly lower than our obtained value for Al-based compressor valve plate material (21935 2 W/m ). The structural mechanical properties, including deformation and shear-stress values in the present study were significantly better than those reported in the other study [42], in which eutectic aluminum (Al + 11-13% silicon) alloys were used for the piston, resulting in very high MAX total deformation of 1.2518 mm, MAX equivalent elastic strain of 0.052884 mm/mm, MAX elastic shear stress of 0.071391 MPa, MAX shear stress of 1905.5 MPa, and MAX equivalent stress of 3756.6 MPa. It is to be noted that the feasibility of this composite has been experimentally developed by a recent study [28]. Hence, internal combustion engines could be made more efficient and dependable with the help of this simulation work’s contribution to better engine part design using finite element analysis of the plate and piston [43].

4. Conclusion

Figure 19. Total heat flux distributions of all the PEEK-Al composites along with pristine Al and pure PEEK-based materials for plate and piston

3.3. Comparison and prediction

It is to be mentioned that the present simulation predicts MAX von Mises equivalent stresses and heat flux values in piston areas, aligning with previous Al-Si alloy piston studies’ MAX heat flux 6 (5.5562´10 W/m²) based on coatings [38], MAX deformation (0.039441 mm), and peak stresses (22.885 - 41.17 MPa) [39]. Researchers also reported that the standard piston model used in diesel engine FEA showed that maximum stress varied from 228 MPa to

89. MPa [39,40]. Their approach provided granular regional analysis

and maintained stresses below the alloy’s yield strength, thereby ensuring design safety. According to the literature, enhanced thermal barrier coatings and improved long-term fatigue resistance can improve the performance of Al-Si pistons.

In the present study, FEA was used to analyse the compressor valve plate and engine piston made of Al, PEEK, and their composites with varying Al volume percentages 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%. Structural and thermal FEA results indicate that PEEK-40%Al demonstrates heat transfer characteristics when used as both plate and piston material. The PEEK-40%Al material would exhibit the best heat transfer 2 (up to 2590.3 W/m heat flux for compressor valve plate and 74.939 2 W/m for engine piston) and overall optimal mechanical properties 7 (up to 1.056×10 Pa or 10. 56 MPa shear stress for compressor valve 7 plate and 8.815×10 Pa or 88.15 MPa shear stress for engine piston) for both the plate and piston components. The present composite piston simulation study lacks experimental validation, employs steady-state conditions, and omits fatigue and wear analyses. Real engine operation and long-term durability depend on cyclic loading and material deterioration, both of which are ignored by most models. For a thorough evaluation of piston design, experimental testing and transient analysis are required because such restrictions may affect life projections and performance assessments.

The method for preparing the plate and piston from composite materials is not included in the present study. In the future, this study may be evaluated experimentally and compared with these simulated results. Future directions in piston and valve plate research may involve transient heat transfer to simulate operating conditions, cyclic loading to understand fatigue behaviour, and hybrid reinforcements to enhance mechanical and thermal performance. Next-generation lightweight, high-performance engine components will benefit from these improvements in design accuracy, durability forecasts, and material optimization.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur for permitting them to perform the study and providing all the facilities needed.

Appendices IC Al ICE Cu PEEK PAEK PEEK-10%Al PEEK-20%Al PEEK-30%Al PEEK-40%Al PEO Piston Plate FEA MIN MAX Xuc Xuf Xm ρ ρAl ρP VAl Vp μ μAl μP E EAl EP σyt σAl σP σyc scAl

[2] internal combustion aluminium internal combustion engine copper poly(ether ether ketone) poly(aryl ether ketone) composite having 90 vol% PEEK and 10 vol% Al composite having 80 vol% PEEK and 20 vol% Al composite having 70 vol% PEEK and 30 vol% Al composite having 60 vol% PEEK and 40 vol% Al Plasma electrolytic oxidation engine piston compressor valve plate finite element analysis minimum maximum property of the composite property of the filler property of matrix density of composite density of aluminium density of PEEK volume fraction of Al volume fraction of PEEK Poisson’s ratio of composite Poisson’s ratio of Al Poisson’s ratio of PEEK Young’s modulus of composite Young’s modulus of Al Young’s modulus of PEEK tensile yield strength of composite tensile yield strength of Al tensile yield strength of PEEK compressive yield strength compressive yield strength of Al

compressive yield strength of PEEK tensile ultimate strength of composite tensile ultimate strength of Al tensile ultimate strength of PEEK isotropic thermal conductivity of composite isotropic thermal conductivity of Al isotropic thermal conductivity of PEEK specific heat of composite specific heat of PEEK specific heat of Al

Vedharaj, R. Vallinayagam, W.M. Yang, S.K. Chou, K.J.E. Chua, P.S. Lee, Experimental and finite element analysis of a coated diesel engine fueled by cashew nut shell liquid biodiesel. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 53, 259–268, (2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.12.018. Srinadh, K Rajasekhara Babu, Static and Thermal Analysis of Piston and Piston Rings. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences 3(8), 51-58, (2015). A.K. Sharma, R. Bhandari, C. Pinca-Bretotean, Impact of silicon carbide reinforcement on characteristics of aluminium metal matrix composite. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1781(1), 012031, (2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1781/1/012031. Sun, C. Li, B. Deng, J. Yang, L. Zhou, Theoretical and numerical investigation of introduced errors in surface temperature measurements of pistons applied in internal combustion engine. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 59, 104441, (2024). Konka, J. Rao, K. S. A. Gupta, Heat insulation analysis of an aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure. Journal of Thermal Engineering 1(3), 210-220, (2015). N. S. Jani, N. H. Saeid, Thermal stress analysis in pin fin microchannel heat sink. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 10(2),210-220,(2024). S.S. Dash, D. Chen. A review on processing–microstructure– property relationships of Al-Si alloys: Recent advances in deformation behavior. Metals 13(3), 609, (2023). Du, C. Fei, Z. Qian, S. Zhu, Z. Shu, K. Zhou, Simulation analysis of thermal insulation performance of diesel engine piston based on PEO and La2Zr2O7 thermal barrier coating. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 59, 104460, (2024). K.O. Pedersen, H.J. Roven, O.G. Lademo, O.S. Hopperstad, Strength and ductility of aluminium alloy AA7030. Materials Science and Engineering: A 473(1-2), 81-89, (2008) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.089. Ceschini, A. Morri, E. Balducci, N. Cavina, N. Rojo, L. Calogero, L. Poggio, Experimental observations of engine piston damage induced by knocking combustion. Materials & Design 114, 312-325 (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matdes.2016.11.015.

Yasmin, A.A. Khalid, M.M. Haque, Tribological (wear) properties of aluminum–silicon eutectic base alloy under dry sliding condition. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153, 833-838 (2004) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.147. F.S. Silva, Fatigue on engine pistons–A compendium of case studies. Engineering failure analysis 13(3), 480-492 (2006) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.023. K.K. Kar, S. Pramanik. Hydroxyapatite poly (etheretherketone) nanocomposites and method of manufacturing same. U.S. Patent 8,652,373, Issued on February 18, 2014, https:// patents.google.com/patent/US8652373B2/en. Patel, T.R. Hull, R.E. Lyon, S.I. Stoliarov, R.N. Walters, S. Crowley, N. Safronava, Investigation of the thermal decomposition and flammability of PEEK and its carbon and glass-fibre composites. Polymer Degradation and Stability 96(1), 12-22, (2011) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.11.009. Senkathir, S. Pramanik, M. Mukherjee, Evaluation of process parameters for poly (ether ether ketone) to poly (ether ether ketone) friction welded joint. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 236(2), 266-273, (2022) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/13506501211025120. Hou, C.X. Shan, K.L. Choy, Microstructures and tribological properties of PEEK-based nanocomposite coatings incorporating inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles. Surface and Coatings Technology 202(11), 2287-2291, (2008) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.010. Sundriyal, M. Sahu, O. Prakash, S. Bhattacharya, Long-term surface modification of PEEK polymer using plasma and PEG silane treatment. Surfaces and Interfaces 25, 101253, (2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101253. Manzoor, A. Golbang, S. Jindal, D. Dixon, A. McIlhagger, E. Harkin-Jones, D. Crawford, E. Mancuso, 3D printed PEEK/ HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive potential. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 121, 104601, (2021) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104601. K.C. McGilvray, E.I. Waldorff, J. Easley, H.B. Seim, N. Zhang, R.J. Linovitz, J.T. Ryaby, C.M. Puttlitz, Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses. The Spine Journa, 17(12),1907-1916,(2017)DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.034. Berretta, R. Davies, Y.T. Shyng, Y. Wang, O. Ghita, Fused Deposition Modelling of high temperature polymers: Exploring CNT PEEK composites. Polymer Testing 63, 251-262, (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.024.

Doll, A. Verdesca, E. Bastos, T. Osswald, R. Kleiss, Methodology for quasi-viscoelastic simulation of polymer gears made from PEEK using Ansys. Proceedings of the ANTEC, Orlando, FL, USA, 23-25, (2015). T.P. Oliveira, S.N. Silva, J.A. Sousa, Flexural fatigue behavior of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) injection moldings derived from dynamic mechanical analysis. International Journal of Fatigue 108, 1-8, (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.016. E.M. Munyao, J.G. He, Y. Zhiyuan, Z.X. Yi, Simulation of Thermal-Mechanical Strength for Marine Engine Piston Using FEA. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 4(3), 319-323, (2014). Singh, D. Pramanik, Structural and thermal analysis of a CI engine piston of different materials using FEM technique. MR International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(1), 4148, (2018). Yan, Q. Tong, W. Zhang, Y. Yuan, S. Jin, Z. Guo, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, Z.Cao, Research on accelerated thermal fatigue testing and life prediction of Al-Si alloy pistons under start-stop cycles. International Journal of Fatigue 191, 108677, (2025) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108677 S.N. Khan, A. Usman, M.S. Afzal, M. Tanveer, M. Liwicki, A. Almqvist, C.W. Park, Numerical investigation of thermomechanical behavior of Yttrium barium zirconate-coated aluminum alloy piston in an internal combustion engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 236, 121603 (2024) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121603 Vaidya, H. Ning, M. Janney, M. Mauhar, K. Graham, M. Streckel. Thermoplastic composite connecting rods. Composites Part B: Engineering 252, 110518, (2023) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110518 Senkathir, S. Pramanik, M. Mukherjee, Nanomechanical analysis of friction welded similar PEEK/aluminum nanocomposites: Effect of metal particle reinforcement. Polymer Composites 45(4), 3839-3852, (2024) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1002/pc.28033. Francis, R.K. Rai, A.K. Singh, P.K. Singh, H. Yadav, Structural analysis of ladder chassis frame for jeep using Ansys. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research 4(4), 41-47, (2014). A.R. Anugu, N.V.T. Reddy, D. Venkateswarlu, Theoritical modelling and finite element analysis of automobile piston. Materials Today: Proceedings 45, 1799-1803, DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.741. K. Sharma, P. K. Saini, N. K. Samria, Experimental thermal analysis of diesel engine piston and cylinder wall. Journal of Engineering 2015(1), 178652, (2015). DOI: https://doi. org/10.1155/2015/178652 MAHLE International GmbH. “Piston materials.” In: Pistons and engine testing, pp. 59-82. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-86620_4

Yerbolat, S. Amangeldi, M.H. Ali, N. Badanova, A. Ashirbeok, G. Islam, Composite materials property determination by rule of mixture and monte carlo simulation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing (ICAM)

16. Nov 2018, 384-387, (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/

AMCON.2018.8615034. Tjahjono, M.K. Schreyer, L. Guo, M. Garland. “Determination of the individual specific heat capacities of solids from multi-component powder mixtures and polymorphic mixtures: A combined analysis of quantitative PXRD and calorimetry measurements.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 108(1), 361-370, 1 (2012) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10973-011-1928-4. Sang, W. Ai, T. Liu, Y. Wu, C. Ma, Insights into the specific heat capacity enhancement of ternary carbonate nanofluids with SiO2 nanoparticles: the effect of change in the composition ratio. RSC Advances 9, 5288-5294, (2019) DOI: 10.1039/ C8RA10318F Y.X. Wang, Y.Q. Liu, H.Y. Shi, Finite element static and dynamic analysis for a piston. Advanced Materials Research 97, 3323-3326, (2010) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.3323. H.R. Kumar, A.A. MT, S.S. Warrier, S.S. Prabu, Comparative study on thermal analysis of extended surface using ANSYS simulation. ECS Transactions 107(1), 12209, (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.12209ecst. Rajakumar, M. Karthiyaraj, A comparative study of structural and thermal analyses on piston materials. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research 5, 208-212, (2020). Inusah, J. Nkrumah, V. Atindana, Static and Thermal Analysis of Aluminium (413,390,384 and 332) Piston Using Finite Element Method. Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Material Science 14, 1-38, (2024). DOI: 10.4236/ mnsms.2024.141001. A.R. Bhagat, Y.M. Jibhakate, K. Chimote, Thermal Analysis and Optimization of IC Engine Piston using finite element method. Gas 2(1), 6207-6216, (2012). Durgam, A. Kale, N. Kene, A. Khedkar, S. Palve, N. M. Gawai, Thermal analysis of fin materials for engine cylinder heat transfer enhancement. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1126(1), 012071, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1126/1/012071 H.N. Shah and S. Pandey, Analysis and Performance of Coating Material Based Piston of I.C. Engine using CATIA and ANSYS Software. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 4(1), 1252-1261, (2023). Thakur, A.S. Johal, D. Kapila, Design and Modification of Engine Piston—Review. In: A. Bhardwaj, P.M. Pandey, A. Misra, (eds) Optimization of Production and Industrial Systems. CPIE 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore, (2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98199-8343-8_22.

References

  1. Yasmin, A.A. Khalid, M.M. Haque, Tribological (wear) prop- [21] Doll, A. Verdesca, E. Bastos, T. Osswald, R. Kleiss, Methodol- erties of aluminum–silicon eutectic base alloy under dry slid- ogy for quasi-viscoelastic simulation of polymer gears made ing condition. Journal of Materials Processing Technology from PEEK using Ansys. Proceedings of the ANTEC, Orlan- 153, 833-838 (2004) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatpro- do, FL, USA, 23-25, (2015). tec.2004.04.147. [22] T.P. Oliveira, S.N. Silva, J.A. Sousa, Flexural fatigue behavior
  2. F.S. Silva, Fatigue on engine pistons–A compendium of case of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated polyether-ether-ke- studies. Engineering failure analysis 13(3), 480-492 (2006) tone (PEEK) injection moldings derived from dynamic me- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.023. chanical analysis. International Journal of Fatigue 108, 1-8,
  3. K.K. Kar, S. Pramanik. Hydroxyapatite poly (etheretherke- (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.016. tone) nanocomposites and method of manufacturing same. [23] E.M. Munyao, J.G. He, Y. Zhiyuan, Z.X. Yi, Simulation of U.S. Patent 8,652,373, Issued on February 18, 2014, https:// Thermal-Mechanical Strength for Marine Engine Piston Us- patents.google.com/patent/US8652373B2/en. ing FEA. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
  4. Patel, T.R. Hull, R.E. Lyon, S.I. Stoliarov, R.N. Walters, S. 4(3), 319-323, (2014). Crowley, N. Safronava, Investigation of the thermal de- [24] Singh, D. Pramanik, Structural and thermal analysis of a CI composition and flammability of PEEK and its carbon and engine piston of different materials using FEM technique. MR glass-fibre composites. Polymer Degradation and Stability International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7(1), 41- 96(1), 12-22, (2011) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymde- 48, (2018). gradstab.2010.11.009. [25] Yan, Q. Tong, W. Zhang, Y. Yuan, S. Jin, Z. Guo, H. Zhang,
  5. Senkathir, S. Pramanik, M. Mukherjee, Evaluation of pro- Y. Yu, Z.Cao, Research on accelerated thermal fatigue testing cess parameters for poly (ether ether ketone) to poly (ether and life prediction of Al-Si alloy pistons under start-stop ether ketone) friction welded joint. Proceedings of the In- cycles. International Journal of Fatigue 191, 108677, (2025) stitution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engi- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108677 neering Tribology 236(2), 266-273, (2022) DOI: https://doi. [26] S.N. Khan, A. Usman, M.S. Afzal, M. Tanveer, M. Liwicki, A. org/10.1177/13506501211025120. Almqvist, C.W. Park, Numerical investigation of thermome-
  6. Hou, C.X. Shan, K.L. Choy, Microstructures and tribolog- chanical behavior of Yttrium barium zirconate-coated alumi- ical properties of PEEK-based nanocomposite coatings in- num alloy piston in an internal combustion engine. Applied corporating inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles. Surface Thermal Engineering 236, 121603 (2024) DOI: https://doi. and Coatings Technology 202(11), 2287-2291, (2008) DOI: org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121603 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.010. [27] Vaidya, H. Ning, M. Janney, M. Mauhar, K. Graham, M.
  7. Sundriyal, M. Sahu, O. Prakash, S. Bhattacharya, Long-term Streckel. Thermoplastic composite connecting rods. Compos- surface modification of PEEK polymer using plasma and PEG ites Part B: Engineering 252, 110518, (2023) DOI: https://doi. silane treatment. Surfaces and Interfaces 25, 101253, (2021) org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101253. [28] Senkathir, S. Pramanik, M. Mukherjee, Nanomechanical
  8. Manzoor, A. Golbang, S. Jindal, D. Dixon, A. McIlhagger, E. analysis of friction welded similar PEEK/aluminum nano- Harkin-Jones, D. Crawford, E. Mancuso, 3D printed PEEK/ composites: Effect of metal particle reinforcement. Polymer HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Composites 45(4), 3839-3852, (2024) DOI: https://doi. Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance org/10.1002/pc.28033. and bioactive potential. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior [29] Francis, R.K. Rai, A.K. Singh, P.K. Singh, H. Yadav, Structural of Biomedical Materials 121, 104601, (2021) DOI: https://doi. analysis of ladder chassis frame for jeep using Ansys. Interna- org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104601. tional Journal of Modern Engineering Research 4(4), 41-47,
  9. K.C. McGilvray, E.I. Waldorff, J. Easley, H.B. Seim, N. Zhang, (2014). R.J. Linovitz, J.T. Ryaby, C.M. Puttlitz, Evaluation of a poly- [30] A.R. Anugu, N.V.T. Reddy, D. Venkateswarlu, Theoritical etheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody modelling and finite element analysis of automobile piston. spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biome- Materials Today: Proceedings 45, 1799-1803, DOI: https:// chanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analy- doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.741. ses. The Spine Journa, 17(12),1907-1916,(2017)DOI: https:// [31] K. Sharma, P. K. Saini, N. K. Samria, Experimental thermal doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.034. analysis of diesel engine piston and cylinder wall. Journal
  10. Berretta, R. Davies, Y.T. Shyng, Y. Wang, O. Ghita, Fused Depo- of Engineering 2015(1), 178652, (2015). DOI: https://doi. sition Modelling of high temperature polymers: Exploring org/10.1155/2015/178652 CNT PEEK composites. Polymer Testing 63, 251-262, (2017) [32] MAHLE International GmbH. “Piston materials.” In: Pistons DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.024. and engine testing, pp. 59-82. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-8662- 0_4 Sangli S. and Pramanik S. 1380
  11. Yerbolat, S. Amangeldi, M.H. Ali, N. Badanova, A. Ashirbeok, G. Islam, Composite materials property determination by rule of mixture and monte carlo simulation. In: 2018 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Advanced Manufacturing (ICAM) 16 Nov 2018, 384-387, (2018) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ AMCON.2018.8615034.
  12. Tjahjono, M.K. Schreyer, L. Guo, M. Garland. “Determi- nation of the individual specific heat capacities of solids from multi-component powder mixtures and polymorphic mixtures: A combined analysis of quantitative PXRD and calorimetry measurements.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 108(1), 361-370, 1 (2012) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s10973-011-1928-4.
  13. Sang, W. Ai, T. Liu, Y. Wu, C. Ma, Insights into the specific heat capacity enhancement of ternary carbonate nanofluids with SiO2 nanoparticles: the effect of change in the composi- tion ratio. RSC Advances 9, 5288-5294, (2019) DOI: 10.1039/ C8RA10318F
  14. Y.X. Wang, Y.Q. Liu, H.Y. Shi, Finite element static and dy- namic analysis for a piston. Advanced Materials Research 97, 3323-3326, (2010) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scien- tific.net/AMR.97-101.3323.
  15. H.R. Kumar, A.A. MT, S.S. Warrier, S.S. Prabu, Comparative study on thermal analysis of extended surface using ANSYS simulation. ECS Transactions 107(1), 12209, (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.12209ecst.
  16. Rajakumar, M. Karthiyaraj, A comparative study of struc- tural and thermal analyses on piston materials. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research 5, 208-212, (2020).
  17. Inusah, J. Nkrumah, V. Atindana, Static and Thermal Anal- ysis of Aluminium (413,390,384 and 332) Piston Using Finite Element Method. Modeling and Numerical Simu- lation of Material Science 14, 1-38, (2024). DOI: 10.4236/ mnsms.2024.141001.
  18. A.R. Bhagat, Y.M. Jibhakate, K. Chimote, Thermal Analysis and Optimization of IC Engine Piston using finite element method. Gas 2(1), 6207-6216, (2012).
  19. Durgam, A. Kale, N. Kene, A. Khedkar, S. Palve, N. M. Ga- wai, Thermal analysis of fin materials for engine cylinder heat transfer enhancement. In IOP Conference Series: Mate- rials Science and Engineering 1126(1), 012071, (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1126/1/012071
  20. H.N. Shah and S. Pandey, Analysis and Performance of Coat- ing Material Based Piston of I.C. Engine using CATIA and ANSYS Software. International Journal of Research Publica- tion and Reviews 4(1), 1252-1261, (2023).
  21. Thakur, A.S. Johal, D. Kapila, Design and Modification of En- gine Piston—Review. In: A. Bhardwaj, P.M. Pandey, A. Misra, (eds) Optimization of Production and Industrial Systems. CPIE 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Spring- er, Singapore, (2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981- 99-8343-8_22.

Share and Cite

Sangli, S.; Pramanik, S. Structural and thermal analysis of poly ether ether ketone aluminium composites through finite elem. Journal of Thermal Engineering 2026, Vol. 12, pp. 1368-1380. https://doi.org/10.47481/jten.0036

Export:

Related Articles

Finite elementbased parametric analysis and geometric optimization of stress concentration in semiciSangram S. Bhosale, Sachin M. Bhosle, 1 January 2026Fabrication of Superhydrophilic TEOS-Lactic acid Composite Films and Investigation of Biofouling BehaviourTuğçe Ervan, Mehmet Ali Küçüker et al., 1 January 2022Prediction of dual-axis solar tracking of the PV system for optimal power output using GA DE TLBO JaMukesh KUMAR, PRABHANSU, 1 January 2025Experimental and simulation study to evaluate effect of radial air injection on performance of motorNilaj N. DESHMUKH, Kishor V. MANE et al., 1 January 2025
Publication History
Published1 January 2026
Versionv1
AccessOpen Access
10.47481/jten.0036
Article Figures (9)
Figure 1Figure 2Figure 3Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6Figure 7Figure 8Figure 9
Related Articles
Finite elementbased parametric analysis and geometric optimization of stress concentration in semiciSangram S. Bhosale, Sachin M. BhosleJournal of Thermal Engineering, 1 January 2026Fabrication of Superhydrophilic TEOS-Lactic acid Composite Films and Investigation of Biofouling BehaviourTuğçe Ervan, Mehmet Ali Küçüker et al.Journal of Thermal Engineering, 1 January 2022Prediction of dual-axis solar tracking of the PV system for optimal power output using GA DE TLBO JaMukesh KUMAR, PRABHANSUJournal of Thermal Engineering, 1 January 2025
Journal of Thermal Engineering coverJournal of Thermal Engineering Download PDF

Subscribe to YTUP

Stay connected and receive the latest research updates directly in your inbox.

YTUP — Yıldız Technical University Publishing

Advancing knowledge and fostering innovation through high-quality, peer-reviewed academic publications.

About YTU

Discover

  • ›Articles
  • ›Journals
  • ›Research Topics
  • ›Open Access Policy

Guidelines

  • ›Author guidelines
  • ›Services for authors
  • ›Policies and publication ethics
  • ›Editor guidelines
  • ›Fee policy

Explore

  • ›Articles
  • ›Research Topics
  • ›Journals
  • ›How we publish

Support

  • ›Help center
  • ›Emails and alerts
  • ›Contact us
  • ›Submit
  • ›Career opportunities
YTU Logo

© 2026 Yıldız Technical University (Istanbul, Turkey)

Terms and ConditionsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyPrivacy SettingsDisclaimer
Like this platform? Join our teamHave feedback or questions?
Supervisor